[Rudder]

Intelligent design is only an idea and one not at all based in science. Why then should it be included in a science curricula? So we can excercise more tolerance? According to your thinking every idea should belong in the science curricula. I'm glad you're not training to become a scientist, because you'd be very busy learning about the universe of all possible ideas.

[Qwinn]

"Intelligent design is only an idea and one not at all based in science."

That's your opinion. I find that the argument of irreducible complexity, among others, -is- scientific in nature and rather difficult to dispute, actually. I'm not saying I'm convinced, but to say it has no basis in science or logic and children cannot be exposed to the idea is simply prejudice and censorship.

Qwinn

[nmh]

LOL!

Since you did not witness "evolutions" and your dating methods are shall we say a tad shoddy to put it gently, th ereality is that you have NO evidence to support your faith in the theory of evolution. The bitter truth is that Intelligent Design is shown in the evidence. There are NO transitional animals or humans. YouR "evidence" is based on faith in order out of chaos and random generation since according to you there is NO God.