[Qwinn]

I don't care if it's necessarily taught as a separate theory. What I want taught is the legitimate issues and doubts that many people have with evolutionary theory.

The evolutionists, of course, don't want to see any doubt cast on it at all, because they can't believe that anyone could -honestly- doubt -their- sincerely held religious beliefs, it's just all part of some big theocratic conspiracy, or if not, they're just idiots who aren't as smart as they are.

Which sounds awfully like both the attitude and methods of liberals, if you ask me.

Qwinn

[ThinkPlease]

What I want taught is the legitimate issues and doubts that many people have with evolutionary theory.

If we did that for every science course, kids would learn nothing. What makes biology different?

[Dimensio]

I don't care if it's necessarily taught as a separate theory.

Um, if WHAT is taught as a seperate theory!? I asked what the other theory, the second part of the "both" where the first is evolution, was at issue here.

What I want taught is the legitimate issues and doubts that many people have with evolutionary theory.

I wouldn't mind that. Name a few legitimate issues and doubts of evolution theory. Don't forget to name the "alternate" theory to which you alluded earlier, as well.