To: armymarinedad
Forgive me if I sound narrow-minded, but I have never understood how one can swear an oath to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States" and then willingly obey the orders of those "domestic" enemies of the Constitution in Washington. Shouldn't the oath take precedence over the whim of some politician?
164 posted on
03/06/2004 5:12:04 PM PST by
sheltonmac
("Duty is ours; consequences are God's." -Gen. Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson)
To: sheltonmac
Shouldn't the oath take precedence over the whim of some politician?Go ahead. Be enlisted and try it. Watch what happens.
165 posted on
03/06/2004 5:14:33 PM PST by
rdb3
(The Servant of Jehovah is the Christ of Calvary and of the empty tomb.)
To: sheltonmac
Shouldn't the oath take precedence over the whim of some politician? It does. That is why they go when sent. The military doesn't decide when to go to war. Under the Constitution the politicians we elect do. They are just following the Constitution. So don't blame the soldiers or the politicians. We elect them so the blame is in our mirrors.
180 posted on
03/06/2004 7:21:31 PM PST by
armymarinedad
(Patriots love their way of life. Liberals love their lifestyle.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson