Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xusafflyer
The "right to privacy".
"Not in the Constitution judge...never has been."

It doesn't have to be. It preceded the Constitution. See the 9th Amendment.

"Since I work for a financial institution"

You work for a car dealer? That's what a "financial institution" is now, along with whatever they want to call one later.

How about due process? Is that in the Constitution? When the police equivalent of the fat lady at the DMV can rubber stamp a form letter and gather any and all records on how you spend your money from anybody that takes cash from the public and the sources of that information are prohibited from telling you about it, that is not due process.

I'll bet Hillary or her equivalent will enjoy that little provision.
23 posted on 03/05/2004 7:17:09 AM PST by agitator (...And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: agitator
It's definately something that goes against the words of the Constitution, I fully agree with that. We need an act that will protect us from Terrorist, but we don't need to have one that will put us in a postion where we need protection from our own Government and this is where this is going.
31 posted on 03/05/2004 7:30:59 AM PST by HELLRAISER II (Give us another tax break Mr. President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson