Skip to comments.
Repeal the Patriot Act - ANDREW NAPOLITANO
The Wall Street Journal ^
| Friday, March 5, 2004
| ANDREW P. NAPOLITANO
Posted on 03/05/2004 6:43:38 AM PST by TroutStalker
Edited on 04/22/2004 11:51:13 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Earlier this week when President Bush asked Congress to re-enact the portions of the Patriot Act that are due to expire at the end of next year, he provoked a critical review of this controversial law. Those who believe that our freedoms are guaranteed and cannot be legislated away by Congress remain committed to the repeal -- not the renewal -- of this overreaching legislation.
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
TOPICS: Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: napolitano; patriotact
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
To: TroutStalker
what do you expect? he's a lawyer -- his allegiance is to the bar.
2
posted on
03/05/2004 6:46:10 AM PST
by
dep
(Ense Petit Placidam Sub Libertate Qvietem)
To: TroutStalker
Most of the time I find this judge a jerk. In this instance, he's 100% correct.
3
posted on
03/05/2004 6:46:35 AM PST
by
agitator
(...And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark)
To: dep
He also likes gay marriage - another faux Foxnews "conservative"
To: TroutStalker
He's right, I don't care for the Patriot Act either. I think a version of the Patriot Act does need to exist, but it needs to be revamped and it needs to exclude any prosecutable act other than Terrorism in my opinion.
5
posted on
03/05/2004 6:46:55 AM PST
by
HELLRAISER II
(Give us another tax break Mr. President)
To: TroutStalker
Those who believe that our freedoms are guaranteed and cannot be legislated away by Congress remain committed to the repeal -- not the renewal -- of this overreaching legislation. Gee. Kinda like the 2nd Amendment, huh, judge?
6
posted on
03/05/2004 6:49:14 AM PST
by
pabianice
To: TroutStalker
Yes, and replace it with the "Non-citizen Muslim Act of 2004".
All non-citizen Muslims are to be returned to their place of origin within 60 days. After thorough investigation, those worthy of return shall be readmitted. They will, however, be closely watched.
7
posted on
03/05/2004 6:50:55 AM PST
by
JimRed
(Fight election fraud! Volunteer as a local poll watcher, challenger or district official.)
To: dep
what do you expect? he's a lawyer -- his allegiance is to the bar. He was a judge, of the non-activist variety that most of us here supposedly prefer. I'll stick with the Constitution as written.
8
posted on
03/05/2004 6:56:27 AM PST
by
TroutStalker
(Whip me, strip me, tie me, fly me -- catch & release)
To: over3Owithabrain
Ditto, he is irrelevant. Fox needs a replacement for him. FAST.
To: over3Owithabrain
If the government can get evidence against you from your financial institution under the guise of national security -- i.e., without a showing of probable cause -- but use it in a criminal case against you, then the Constitution's guarantees have been shredded. But you know that already. Sounds conservative to me.
10
posted on
03/05/2004 7:00:24 AM PST
by
TroutStalker
(Whip me, strip me, tie me, fly me -- catch & release)
"which he defined as "the right to be let alone" "
That is the arguement they used in Roe v Wade. The "right to privacy".
Not in the Constitution judge...never has been.
Since I work for a financial institution, I know exactly what they require for Patriot Act.
Name, SSN, DOB and Address. Yup, evil information there. Oh wait, they also happen to use that info to pay taxes. Guess the 1040 is evil too. Well, it is...but not in that way.
11
posted on
03/05/2004 7:03:52 AM PST
by
xusafflyer
(Keep paying those taxes California. Mexico thanks you.)
To: TroutStalker
10-4 on that Trout Stalker. The Govt. and the Law Enforcement think that they have the right to hassle anyone they deem necessary, yet they won't do profiling to catch the real criminals, so they just hassle all of us instead to make it fair.
Yesterday I had to go through 3 damn road blocks on 3 different streets and the cop checked my liscense, ins. card & registration each time, while the Drug Task Force Nazi and his K-9 walked around my car looking through every window and so forth. The Patriot Act along with these Nazi like cops who look at us like were all drug dealers are really pissing me off.
12
posted on
03/05/2004 7:05:06 AM PST
by
HELLRAISER II
(Give us another tax break Mr. President)
To: TroutStalker
Strengthen the Patriot Act.
13
posted on
03/05/2004 7:05:06 AM PST
by
petercooper
(Florida 2000: Bush 2,912,790 - Gore 2,912,253)
To: agitator
Most of the time I find this judge a jerk. In this instance, he's 100% correct. Actually, he's one of the few talking heads I can stand to listen to..
and in this instance, he's still 100% correct.
14
posted on
03/05/2004 7:06:47 AM PST
by
evad
(We all stand together OR we hang separately!)
To: TroutStalker
Let it die a disgraceful death.
15
posted on
03/05/2004 7:07:40 AM PST
by
cynicom
To: xusafflyer
Working for a financial institution, you apparently forgot several big ones, like reporting cash transactions above a threshhold and multiple ones just below that threshhold. You could be in big trouble if you're not doing that.
16
posted on
03/05/2004 7:08:37 AM PST
by
TroutStalker
(Whip me, strip me, tie me, fly me -- catch & release)
To: petercooper
Strengthen the Patriot Act. What would you do to it that you would feel comfortable with hillary using it?
17
posted on
03/05/2004 7:10:02 AM PST
by
TroutStalker
(Whip me, strip me, tie me, fly me -- catch & release)
To: TroutStalker
Just another NJ liberal.
18
posted on
03/05/2004 7:10:20 AM PST
by
Unicorn
To: HELLRAISER II
Yesterday I had to go through 3 damn road blocks on 3 different streets and the cop checked my liscense, ins. card & registration each time, while the Drug Task Force Nazi and his K-9 walked around my car looking through every window and so forth. Keeerist HR..where do you live?
19
posted on
03/05/2004 7:10:27 AM PST
by
evad
(We all stand together OR we hang separately!)
To: TroutStalker
What would you do to it that you would feel comfortable with hillary using it? Ahhh..
someone always has to spoil the fun by interjecting reason and sensibility ;-)
20
posted on
03/05/2004 7:12:18 AM PST
by
evad
(We all stand together OR we hang separately!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson