Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Experts say man can live on Mars
Reuters ^ | 3/04/04

Posted on 03/04/2004 7:01:29 PM PST by KevinDavis

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: Ken H
The women go to Venus. First couple to three wins.
21 posted on 03/04/2004 9:37:20 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

22 posted on 03/04/2004 9:44:03 PM PST by P.O.E.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
IOW, it's Adam and Steve vs Madame and Eve.
23 posted on 03/04/2004 9:47:39 PM PST by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: anobjectivist
What is the point of going to the moon?

Apart from it being a safer, cheaper, faster test bed for Martian work (housing, life support, etc.), there's all that Helium 3 ripe for the harvest.

24 posted on 03/04/2004 10:21:57 PM PST by Don Joe (We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Don Joe
For some reason Helium 3 doesn't do it for me because we don't have a fusion plant capable of producing positive energy yet.

safer, cheaper, faster to go there and poke around, but once we're there everything we need to build will have to have materials sent from earth to mars.

It would be cheaper to go from earth to mars then send raw material from mars to the moon. The delta V's required for that is significantly less than those directly from the earth to the moon.

25 posted on 03/05/2004 6:54:23 AM PST by anobjectivist (The natural rights of people are more basic than those currently considered)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: anobjectivist
What is the point of going to the moon?

It's an excellent platform for beta testing space hardware and software.

26 posted on 03/05/2004 9:03:38 AM PST by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
can we send all the people who use this phrase: "Lets send {Hillary, Liberals, President Bush, etc., etc., ad infinitum} to Mars." to Mars?
27 posted on 03/05/2004 2:57:10 PM PST by unibrowshift9b20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anobjectivist
Well, China seems to have caught the vision: They have plans to have a moon base set up by the time people think Fusion will be viable. If we wait until everything is perfect and we have fusion and space elevators and teleporters and ftl drives, it will never happen. Do you think we landed on the moon the first 6 times by waiting until we had everything just right? NO! My TI-83+ probably has more power than their onboard computers did. The whole point of exploration is to go somewhere before anybody else is ready to.
28 posted on 03/05/2004 3:08:44 PM PST by unibrowshift9b20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: In_25_words_or_less
only the English would understand that pic....
29 posted on 03/05/2004 3:18:48 PM PST by Queen Jadis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: nmh
Can we send liberals up there?

Now why do we want to start polluting right off the bat? And, with all the hot air, they'd start talking global warming again.

30 posted on 03/05/2004 4:19:03 PM PST by ItsForTheChildren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: anobjectivist
everything we need to build will have to have materials sent from earth to mars.

Not necessarily. Mars has similar mineral resources as earth. If we can mine for iron on earth, we can do the same on Mars. The Mars starter kit will have to be assembled on Mars, but growth from that point on can be done using native resources.

31 posted on 03/05/2004 4:23:47 PM PST by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ItsForTheChildren
"Now why do we want to start polluting right off the bat? And, with all the hot air, they'd start talking global warming again."

But alteast we'd be pollution free here plus I'd bet the odds are higher that an out of control asteroid would hit them. ;) Then there'd be no more liberal tirades.
32 posted on 03/05/2004 7:20:02 PM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
What I want to know is do we NEED to go to Mars or something? Do you people know of some asteroid or such that makes Mars looks GOOD? Whazzup? Come clean.
33 posted on 03/05/2004 7:44:11 PM PST by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txflake; All
Why did we need to cross the Atlantic? Why did we need to go over the mountain?
34 posted on 03/05/2004 8:10:24 PM PST by KevinDavis (Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: hford02
YE 'GADS!!---

John McCain, (the "Poster Child" for Alzheimer's Disease)--is the LAST "Astronaut" our nation should Contemplate sending to the Moon or Mars.

HE's TOO OLD!!

BY INCREDIBLE, "GREAT GOOD FORTUNE,"--we Live in a "Time" when the Effects of our Collective Will is a "Force" we MUST "Acknowledge!"

35 posted on 03/05/2004 8:22:57 PM PST by Doc On The Bay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson