Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Spiff; hchutch; PRND21; CWOJackson
The point of putting military on the border is to do something about border security now!

Ah. It's not about actually doing something effective--it's just about looking like something is being done.

There is not enough civilian law enforcement trained, equipped, and ready to guard a border.

Actually, there is. It's just horrendously misallocated.

Do we really need troops in Germany guarding the Fulda Gap from invasion by the Soviets?

No, which is why we're moving them to Eastern Europe.

The military stays until civilian law enforcement and National Guard can be ramped up to take over. Military should still offer some assistance after that as necessary.

1. If that's your proposed CONOPS, they will always somehow be "necessary."

2. If you make an army into a border patrol, you will discover that, when a war breaks out, that you will have to send a border patrol to do an army's job.

18 posted on 03/04/2004 8:12:19 PM PST by Poohbah ("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Maj. Vic Deakins, USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Poohbah
Kind of reminds me of the people you see trying to drive a nail with a cresent wrench, or set a screw with a hammer. The just don't understand the relationship between the job and the proper tool.
21 posted on 03/04/2004 9:10:34 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson