Skip to comments.
Strongest sand storm ever captured on satellite over the Sahara
gsfc ^
| 04/03/03
| gsfc
Posted on 03/03/2004 1:51:27 PM PST by Truth666
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
To: Guillermo
I wonder if those black border lines are there in real life?Gridiron yardlines are.
21
posted on
03/03/2004 2:18:58 PM PST
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: Truth666
22
posted on
03/03/2004 2:21:13 PM PST
by
TBall
To: Guillermo
Ah com'on..........u no Kerry said it was BUSH'S fault...
23
posted on
03/03/2004 2:25:02 PM PST
by
litehaus
To: colorado tanker
LOL...One of the many great lines for that great movie.
24
posted on
03/03/2004 2:26:42 PM PST
by
My2Cents
("Well...there you go again.")
To: Guillermo
...or maybe this is part of the pre-release promo for "Hidalgo"
To: BikePacker
Of course we all know that IT IS ALL GEORGE BUSH'S FAULT...
26
posted on
03/03/2004 2:27:36 PM PST
by
bondjamesbond
(Never ascribe to evil intent that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.)
To: Truth666
" The Canary Islands are the only inhabited area affected." This iron rich dust will make it's way all the way to Florida in a few days where it will cover everything in orange. Also, when it lands in the Gulf Of Mexico, the iron causes an explosive growth of plankton (Red Tide) that causes low oxygen zones and kills fish.
27
posted on
03/03/2004 2:29:46 PM PST
by
blam
To: Prodigal Son
Is that coloration sand that is spread/blown laterally or vertically? Looks almost like a vertical cloud. Laterally. The apparent "verticality" is just an optical illusion.
To: Ichneumon
Amending my last post: What's even more striking is how much the sandstorm, and some of the geographic features, look like artificial brushstrokes, as if portions of this photo were painted on.
To: BikePacker
And worse yet, he has no plan to correct the problem.
To: BikePacker
This is obviously Bush's fault.
You beat me to it.
Now I've got a reason to watch the evening news on TV...to see how they
tell about the EEEVVVIIILLL Dubya and his devastation of the environment.
Surely this must be a result of research by Dick "Dr. Evil" Cheney and
his minions at Halliburton.
31
posted on
03/03/2004 2:34:41 PM PST
by
VOA
To: Prodigal Son
Is that coloration sand that is spread/blown laterally or vertically? Looks almost like a vertical cloud. Both, actually. The vertical motion of the storm lifts the sand vertically, and the winds advect the sand laterally.
A picture at:
http://www.osei.noaa.gov/IOD/OSEIiod.jpg
has some arrows to point out the sand.
32
posted on
03/03/2004 2:34:57 PM PST
by
!1776!
To: Truth666
To: !1776!
Thanks for that reply.
To: Ichneumon
"Amending my last post: What's even more striking is how much the sandstorm, and some of the geographic features, look like artificial brushstrokes, as if portions of this photo were painted on.
"
I think those are windrows of sand, deposited from all the sandstorms like this one that sweep the area. Very interesting photo.
35
posted on
03/03/2004 2:38:54 PM PST
by
MineralMan
(godless atheist)
To: Ichneumon
Thanks. That's what I thought too. But when I first looked at it, my mind just read 'vertical' and I couldn't see it any other way after that. Plus I slept through those required six semesters of 'Analyzing Satellite Imagery of Saharan Sand Storms' so I was probably heading into this conundrum with a disadvantage ;-)
To: TBall; maxwell; Eala; Conspiracy Guy
The problem isn't the straight lines in the sand.
(Heck, "anybody" can paint straight lines .....)
The problem is getting those neat little zig-zags on the angled lines exactly right.
37
posted on
03/03/2004 2:45:12 PM PST
by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only support FR by donating monthly, but ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: !1776!; Prodigal Son
[Is that coloration sand that is spread/blown laterally or vertically? Looks almost like a vertical cloud.] Both, actually. The vertical motion of the storm lifts the sand vertically, and the winds advect the sand laterally.
Yes, the sand is of course lifted off the ground, but the amount would not be visible in this photo. Even if it were lifted up into the air as high as the top of Mount Everest, the vertical component would only be equal to five pixels of this image (less than 1% of its width).
It's easy to overestimate the "thickness" of the Earth's atmosphere, or geographic "roughness". If the Earth were the size of a billiard ball, it would be about as smooth *as* a billiard ball, even taking into account such "imperfections" as the depth of the Marianas Trench and the height of Everest. At billiard-ball size, the difference in heights of those features would amount to imperfections no greater than a few one-thousandths of an inch.
To: Prodigal Son
Please don't beat the conundrum too hard.
(Her roommate has a headache and the noise is gonna drive her right out of the convent....)
39
posted on
03/03/2004 2:46:47 PM PST
by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only support FR by donating monthly, but ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: Guillermo
guillermo, where do you live? I too am a Dolphin fan. Port St. Lucie.
Nice Picture,where'd you get it?
40
posted on
03/03/2004 2:47:36 PM PST
by
Joe Boucher
(G.W. Bush in 2004)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson