Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Libertarian444
It's hard to see Kerry *not* taking a hit on national security. His anti-war activism won't help him. His votes against every important weapons system, each of which are now vital in the war on terror, is going to hurt. Surely any sane, non-ideological person can see this.

Kerry thinks, though, that he can wail gloom and doom long enough about the economy to win in November. Thus far, a small ray of hope for this strategy has been allowed to appear. The White House just hasn't articulated the strengths of the economy very well, and thus the "story line" has always been whether Bush can overcome the "weakness" in the economy. Sometimes the point is put that way. Other times pundits will say that the White House "must" make this election about foreign policy. Either way, argh! That the conventional wisdom has evolved to this point is itself indicative of a failure-- thus far-- of the GOP to be aggressive enough in talking up its economic strategy.

Sound familiar? This was dad's failure in 1992: too much of the country believed a period of growth in GDP and jobs was the worst economic period since the depression!!

Like dad, W will have to contend with rags like the Times carrying water for the Democrats. Nevertheless, if he campaigns competently, he'll be more effective than dad was. The public likes W better, and more importantly we're not faced with a monolithic Democrat media as in 1992.

Luckily, he can put things simply, which will lend itself to effective communication despite a hostile portion of the media. In brief, economic growth is strong, real wages are up, taxes are down, jobs are increasing-- and, in any case, a tax increase will kill job growth! This is hardly the most difficult thing an incumbent has ever had to communicate to an electorate. In any case, the future of the country depends on the White House getting this message out, so they'd better be serious about doing it.

I think the election might be close. Still, if Bush campaigns competently, the economy continues to grow and create jobs, and there are no spectacular foreign policy setbacks, he'll win. He's got the most control over the first element. I don't think it's been a gross error to remain silent for now. Soon, though, it's going to be time to speak on these matters. Let's hope the White House does it right.

12 posted on 03/02/2004 8:23:40 PM PST by Timm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Timm
Bush senior made several mistakes, of which the biggest was saying "read my lips" and then raising taxes.

And he was undermined by Ross Perot, who wasted no time attacking clinton.

But the final reason he lost was that he didn't really try. I don't know why, but he just gave up. He didn't really seem to want it. He was tired.

I don't see that happening with GWB.
13 posted on 03/02/2004 8:31:10 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson