Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BushMeister
"Kohl amdt. making subtle changes in S. 1805 language..."

You call the mandatory inclusion of a gun lock with ever firearms sale "subtle?" What in the world would you call "Obvious?"
WWIII?

212 posted on 03/02/2004 7:52:58 PM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Redbob
No, I wasn't referring to the gun lock issue. The Kohl amendment was a 2nd degree amendment, being a change to the Boxer amendment. I seem to remember a Kohl amendment to which Craig referred as being a "slight" change to S. 1805, but I don't see it on Thomas.gov. I thought Kohl had offered some clarifying language to which Craig agreed regarding the underlying S. 1805.

I certainly don't consider the gun lock amendment "subtle", and I'm very creeped out that it got 70 votes. The CPSC oversight is very scary and a chance for real mischief.

BTW, it is already mandatory here in NY State that ALL firearms sold come with a gun lock. Elliot spitzer, I'm sure, will have fun with that one, whether he remains AG or is elected Governor.

216 posted on 03/02/2004 8:07:56 PM PST by BushMeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson