To: ArrogantBustard
Short answer: Because there's absolutely no excuse for its renewal to even be voted on by a subcommittee much less actually be passed by a Republican controlled congress.Amen to all that.
The difference between R and D looks to be summed up for all practical purposes as nothing more than a slightly different rate of erosion of the Constitution.
601 posted on
03/02/2004 1:26:18 PM PST by
newgeezer
(Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary. You have the right to be wrong.)
To: newgeezer
The difference between R and D looks to be summed up for all practical purposes as nothing more than a slightly different rate of erosion of the Constitution. Some days I wonder which party actually has the greater rate of erosion...
To: newgeezer
This was a nice, revealing vote:
Sen. George Allen = Good Guy
Sen. John Warner = PUTZ
605 posted on
03/02/2004 1:29:14 PM PST by
ArrogantBustard
(Chief Engineer, Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemens' Club)
To: newgeezer
"The difference between R and D looks to be summed up for all practical purposes as nothing more than a slightly different rate of erosion of the Constitution."
Yes! And that's why we should all work diligently to get GWB elected, because at least we'll be boiled more slowly! (do I need to say that I'm being sarcastic, here?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson