Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Assault Weapon Ban extension PASSES (Senate amendment to gun industry protection bill)
C-Span ^ | 3-2-04 | Sen. Dianne Feinstein D-CA

Posted on 03/02/2004 9:05:08 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 781-788 next last
To: ArrogantBustard
Those who voted for it on the GOP side are RINOS: Lincoln Chaffee, the Weak Sisters, and John Warner. That makes four votes if 47 Democrats and the Indie Jim Jeffords voted for it. 46 Republicans and 1 Democrat voted against - I think that would be Zell Miller or Ben Nelson. The ideological divides are predictable when it comes to gun control.
41 posted on 03/02/2004 9:25:39 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: *bang_list; Eaker
bang...Bang, Bang.... BANG, BANG, BANG, BANG!!!!
42 posted on 03/02/2004 9:26:17 AM PST by thackney (Life is Fragile, Handle with Prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
Assault Weapon Ban extension PASSES (Senate amendment to gun industry protection bill)

I'm shocked I tell you....shocked.

/HEAVY SARCASM

43 posted on 03/02/2004 9:26:33 AM PST by BureaucratusMaximus (Space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dogbert41
I can sympathize with your reaction, but instead of voting Losertarians we should double up the effore to kick out RINO's and Liberal Republicans from the party. As you said, the gun votes gave them put them in place and gave them what they have. We have the power to reform these thankless a-holes.

You have primaries right? Support the pro-gun candidate, threaten the establishment with the only two things they want from you, money and votes.

44 posted on 03/02/2004 9:26:41 AM PST by AreaMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
they are still voting on the bill, Mc Cain Adm now still have to vote on the bill. Mc Cain aye 53 no 46
45 posted on 03/02/2004 9:27:03 AM PST by not-alone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney
Don't forget Judd Gregg turned on us
46 posted on 03/02/2004 9:28:00 AM PST by conservativefromGa (www.AWBanSunset.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Dogbert41
"It was the GUN vote that gave the Republicans ANYTHING AT ALL -THOSE MUTHER F'ING INGRATES!!!"

Here, here.
47 posted on 03/02/2004 9:28:41 AM PST by KurzeHaare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
That's what you said about CFR, nea increase, etc

CFR was going to pass the house anyway. They had a petition and overruled Hastert.

CFR was a feel good measure. Like it or not people don't care about the consequences of CFR. People see it as not having those nasty political commercials ruining their watching "Friends". It doesn't affect people.

The AWB ban is different. Reps in their districts will be haering from gunowners and those votes ccan sway elections.

48 posted on 03/02/2004 9:28:42 AM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: All
Bush asked for a clean bill. Period. The House can lean on that. Conference will report out a clean bill and then another loaded with not just this AWB extension, but other amendments that are killers for even Dems. There will be so much dirt on the 2nd bill that it won't even reach the president because the Dems themselves will kill it. Then he'll get the first one, the clean bill to sign that both houses passed. This is the optimal political scenario.

The alternative is the House can delay any bill coming to the floor at all. The clock can run out, and if the bill is worded well, it can be arranged so it is the Dems that force the clock to run out because they would not support the bill so arranged. There are tons of things that can be done like that -- for example exempting any company from the lawsuit immunity that are in Dem districts.

No way the WH does anything controversial with this bill. Why should they? The Dems will push it if it can cost Bush votes and will be vocal about it, but we control the agenda and we can bring forward only the bills we want to make us look good.

Now then, all you alleged hyper conservatives who want to vote Bush out of office because the GOP Congress can protect you -- have a look at what a gutless GOP Senate will mean for Kerry court nominees -- and get on the phone to the GOP campaign headquarters and start volunteering to get Bush re-elected. This entire debacle is what happens if you don't do that. Voting is not enough. You have to GOTV for Bush to prevent this disaster.
49 posted on 03/02/2004 9:29:51 AM PST by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Mr.Clark





The House won't pass this. No way is Rove that stupid.

There is no guarantee that the House won't pass the AWB extension, and Rove is indeed that stupid.


50 posted on 03/02/2004 9:30:26 AM PST by Sabertooth (Malcontent for Bush - 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Dane
The House is more conservative than the Senate. The Senate has quite a few RINOs who are the swing votes between GOP conservatives and the liberal Senate Democrats. That's not the case in the House, where most Republicans are pro-gun.
51 posted on 03/02/2004 9:31:00 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Little Pig
Got mine back in October. Make sure you pick up some hi-cap mags and a bipod, too.
52 posted on 03/02/2004 9:31:01 AM PST by CholeraJoe (Pararescue: Don't call 911, call 243.0. I'll rappel down headfirst if I have to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
If Bush signs this I just may give Nader my vote to spite all the Dems and Repubs, even though I despise him.
53 posted on 03/02/2004 9:31:14 AM PST by Chewbacca ("Turn off your machines! Walk off your jobs! Power to the People!" - The Ice Pirates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seth1
It will go to the House, the House will vote against it, it will go to conference.

Not a big deal.

If it looks like it will pass conference intact or the House will pass it, that would be a big deal.
54 posted on 03/02/2004 9:31:31 AM PST by rwfromkansas ("Men stumble over the truth, but most pick themselves up as if nothing had happened." Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Chewbacca
They just added the McCain Gun Show Loophole ban. 53-46. Passed.
55 posted on 03/02/2004 9:32:15 AM PST by Dead Corpse (For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: ColdSteelTalon
It will make it very easy for me to vote Libertarian.

Vote Libertarian and your vote is a Democrat vote. And the Democrats will never let you have another shot at any meaningful vote at all. And you'll have to shut up too, because Hillary doesn't take kindly to backtalk, and now she'll have not just the FBI files but the Patriot act to work with.

Enjoy.

56 posted on 03/02/2004 9:32:25 AM PST by DonaldDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
More like ten of them. Including Jawn 'Putz' Wahnuh (P-VA), who is probably unpunishable. I doubt he will run again when his term comes up in 4 years.

Gosh, I hope Morgan Griffith comes up from Richmond to replace him. Did I tell you about Morgan and the gun hearing I went to? Even if I did, for the benefit of others, I'll tell it again.

I was in Richmond to attend a General Assembly hearing, the one I ended up at instead (I got lost) had gun rights advocates testifying, and one of them said that in Tidewater the Dept. of Social Services did not allow gun owners to be foster parents. Mr. Griffith (I had to ask who he was), stopped the man, and in that beautiful Tidewater accent said, "Are you telling me, that they are refusing people as foster parents because they are exercising their Constitutional rights?" And the witness said, "Yes sir, that's exactly what I'm telling you" and Mr. Griffith took out his gold pen and he started to write. He kept the guy after the hearing to get details. Griffith is also very pro-life. I'd love to see him in Washington.

57 posted on 03/02/2004 9:32:28 AM PST by nina0113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
There were quite a few crossovers. Landrieu voted against the AWB extension, for example.

Oh well, politics as usual.

58 posted on 03/02/2004 9:32:30 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
The House conferees can demand the provision be stripped from the bill in conference. DeLay doesn't want to risk a revolt from conservatives if it stays in.
59 posted on 03/02/2004 9:33:16 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Owen
Bush asked for a clean bill. Period. The House can lean on that. Conference will report out a clean bill and then another loaded with not just this AWB extension, but other amendments that are killers for even Dems. There will be so much dirt on the 2nd bill that it won't even reach the president because the Dems themselves will kill it. Then he'll get the first one, the clean bill to sign that both houses passed. This is the optimal political scenario.

The alternative is the House can delay any bill coming to the floor at all. The clock can run out, and if the bill is worded well, it can be arranged so it is the Dems that force the clock to run out because they would not support the bill so arranged. There are tons of things that can be done like that -- for example exempting any company from the lawsuit immunity that are in Dem districts.

No way the WH does anything controversial with this bill. Why should they? The Dems will push it if it can cost Bush votes and will be vocal about it, but we control the agenda and we can bring forward only the bills we want to make us look good.

Conveniently Forgetting Recent events, Dr. Pangloss?


60 posted on 03/02/2004 9:33:38 AM PST by Sabertooth (Malcontent for Bush - 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 781-788 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson