Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Assault Weapon Ban extension PASSES (Senate amendment to gun industry protection bill)
C-Span ^ | 3-2-04 | Sen. Dianne Feinstein D-CA

Posted on 03/02/2004 9:05:08 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed

The vote was:

52 -Aye in favor of extending the ban 47 -Nay opposed to the ban.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: awb; bang; banglist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 781-788 next last
To: TheBigB; All
TheBigB wrote:
The House will vote against it and it will be taken out in conference.
I've heard that before (and it's no more true now than it has been in the past.

We have until 2:15 to call our Senators and express our opposition to S.1805, the "Assault Weapons" Ban Extension and Gun Show "loophole" Closing Act

This bill can't pass with these amendments. We need to send a strong message now.

Call your Senators now at 1-800-648-3516 and tell them you oppose S.1805.

141 posted on 03/02/2004 10:02:04 AM PST by cc2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Its DOA in the House. Tom Delay has promised the AWB extension will never make it to the floor.

Assuming the bill passes in the Senate, there is no choice now. The best that can be done is that the House stand firm and either remove it in conference, or reject the entire bill, but there will be a vote in the House.

142 posted on 03/02/2004 10:02:44 AM PST by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ought-six
Fitzgerald.....



Voted for CFR.
Voted for AW Extention.
Voted aginst ANWR.

No wonder the RINO isn't running for re-election...because he would lose in a landslide
143 posted on 03/02/2004 10:02:47 AM PST by KQQL (@)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Monty22

I'll bet you twenty bucks that the House sunsets this orphaned child in conference. You've got my freepmail. If this thing is signed by Bush, I will send you twenty bucks. No paypal crap, either. A crisp 20 to your home address. Bush will lose the election if he signs this thing, and he knows it. That's why it will never reach his desk.

But if we get past Sept. 13th with no extension? I expect to see Andrew Jackson, proud gunowner, in my mailbox.

See, Bush wants this thing dead. He knows that AWB renewal is a trap set by Democrats to discourage his base voters and cause a split in the Party. So does DeLay. That's why this will die.

Be Seeing You,

Chris

144 posted on 03/02/2004 10:03:19 AM PST by section9 (Major Motoko Kusanagi says, "John Kerry: all John F., no Kennedy..." Click on my pic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Gritty
500,000 votes would be more than enough to swing the election. This election is going to be about as close as 2000. Bush is at serious risk of losing the presidency, and on multiple issues. The AWB was the final straw for many. He signs this, he's in deep doo-doo.
145 posted on 03/02/2004 10:03:21 AM PST by ought-six
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: section9
You forget nothing. That heinous bill passed the Democrat controlled House by precisely ONE vote.

I'll be pounding Allen, Bush, Wolf, and that friggin' PUTZ Warner about this ... And DeLay, too, for that matter. If Mr Bush wants my vote in November, AWB must be dead.

146 posted on 03/02/2004 10:03:28 AM PST by ArrogantBustard (Chief Engineer, Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemens' Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe
Right on. Soon as I can round up the scratch. I've already got access to a pre-ban M1 Carbine, so all I need now is the M1A, a Rem870, and a 1911.
147 posted on 03/02/2004 10:04:12 AM PST by Little Pig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: StoneColdGOP

148 posted on 03/02/2004 10:04:14 AM PST by KantianBurke (Principles, not blind loyalty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
Scott McClellannis taking this question up now.
149 posted on 03/02/2004 10:04:17 AM PST by OXENinFLA ("A free people ought to be armed" ------ George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: tubavil
Yeah but he might change his mind. //sarcasm off
150 posted on 03/02/2004 10:04:49 AM PST by dts32041 ( "Repeal the 16th and 17th amendments.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Owen
CFR has proven to be pro conservative, yes?

Matters not. It's anti-Constitutional.

151 posted on 03/02/2004 10:05:27 AM PST by Colonel_Flagg (If I had a hammer, I'd use it on Peter, Paul, and Mary. -- Howard Rosenberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: ought-six
Call me irresponsible, or just call me Johnson, but I don't think this election will be as close as everyone is saying. There is something about John F.. The more people see, the less they like.

Bush by five points. Book that.

Be Seeing You,

Chris

152 posted on 03/02/2004 10:05:47 AM PST by section9 (Major Motoko Kusanagi says, "John Kerry: all John F., no Kennedy..." Click on my pic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA
He's say the two things are two different subjects. He's saying the Amendments are undermining the Bill.
153 posted on 03/02/2004 10:06:06 AM PST by OXENinFLA ("A free people ought to be armed" ------ George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
The ideological divides are predictable when it comes to gun control.

Yep. Naturally, the big-government, big-tax tyrants don't want the people armed.
Hence, the scumbag Democrats love "gun control".

154 posted on 03/02/2004 10:06:19 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
Ten years---the first time they passed this ridiculous ban.
155 posted on 03/02/2004 10:07:37 AM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
"And just as a note, Bush has supported the AWB since 1999."

Yeah, but 9/11 changed a lot of things. We are not the same country we were in 2000. We have a dagger to our throat, so the rules have changed.
156 posted on 03/02/2004 10:07:41 AM PST by ought-six
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: section9
Agreed.
Bush in a landslide.
157 posted on 03/02/2004 10:07:44 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Dane
People didn't see it as an assault on the 1st amendment.

But what they show your ignorance of political nuance all you want, that's your right and no one has taken that away.

When defending an abridgement of the First Amendment on the grounds that ignorant people, who didn't care one way or the other, don't see CFR as an assault on Free Speech becomes a self-congratulatory excercise in the Emperor's Nuance, I'm not especially concerned when dissembling shills such yourself call me ignorant, Dane.

Folks like yourself are to the GOP what the Clintonistas were to the Democrats; just an ugly stain. You're an amen corner that deems it politically sophisticated to elevate your lack of principle into your highest principle. To whatever extent your type gains sway over the GOP, the Republican Party will simply become an inverse reflection of the unscrupulous Democrats.

Don't wipe the boot polish from your lips, wear it proudly.


158 posted on 03/02/2004 10:07:55 AM PST by Sabertooth (Malcontent for Bush - 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
Ha! Ha! Ha! What a joke! And some of you people still bend over for the Republicans. Seriously; when are you people going to learn?
159 posted on 03/02/2004 10:07:55 AM PST by Merdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Owen
Bush asked for a clean bill. Period.

Not quite, he asked that no amendments be passed that would delay passage. Now that those amendment have been added, and assuming the amended bill passes the Senate, he will likely press for passage of the bill as is, rather than delay it. A nice convienient vehicle for the AWB that he said before the 2000 elections and repeatedly since through his spokespersons that he want's to sign.

160 posted on 03/02/2004 10:08:30 AM PST by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 781-788 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson