To: *Homosexual Agenda; EdReform; scripter; GrandMoM; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping.
Stanley Kurtz is right on. Sullivan isn't human any more.
I wonder what the author thinks is the solution if he is against a constitutional amendment and against same sex marriage? Is there a third option?
Let me know if you want on or off this ping list.
And in case someone hasn't read this yet, here is what a noted homosexual spokesman says about "gay" marriage:
Hint: It's about the children.
An excerpt from: In Their Own Words: The Homosexual Agenda:
"Homosexual activist Michelangelo Signorile, who writes periodically for The New York Times, summarizes the agenda in OUT magazine (Dec/Jan 1994):
"A middle ground might be to fight for same-sex marriage and its benefits and then, once granted, redefine the institution of marriage completely, to demand the right to marry not as a way of adhering to society's moral codes, but rather to debunk a myth and radically alter an archaic institution...
The most subversive action lesbian and gay men can undertake --and one that would perhaps benefit all of society--is to transform the notion of family entirely.
It's the final tool with which to dismantle all sodomy statues, [NOTE THIS:] get education about homosexuality and AIDS into the public schools and in short to usher in a sea change in how society views and treats us."
2 posted on
03/01/2004 11:05:41 PM PST by
little jeremiah
(...men of intemperate minds can not be free. Their passions forge their fetters.)
To: little jeremiah
Also note these statements:
"to demand the right to marry not as a way of adhering to society's moral codes, but rather to debunk a myth and radically alter an archaic institution...
to transform the notion of family entirely."
3 posted on
03/01/2004 11:07:43 PM PST by
little jeremiah
(...men of intemperate minds can not be free. Their passions forge their fetters.)
To: little jeremiah
I wonder what the author thinks is the solution if he is against a constitutional amendment and against same sex marriage? Is there a third option?No, there is no third option. Marriage in one state has to be recognized by other states. Obviously, lacking an amendment, some states are going to legalize gay marriage.
5 posted on
03/01/2004 11:10:06 PM PST by
squidly
(Money is inconvenient for them: give them victuals and an arse-clout, it is enough.)
To: little jeremiah
I agree. Sullivan is just unreadable these days and it's not just on the gay marriage issue.
He's having panic attacks on almost everything and he's projecting that to his blog.
7 posted on
03/01/2004 11:14:40 PM PST by
Fledermaus
(This Tagline For Rent!)
To: little jeremiah
---The most subversive action lesbian and gay men can undertake --and one that would perhaps benefit all of society--is to transform the notion of family entirely. ---
Marxism pure and simple. Hollow out the institutions and when they are weak turn them on their heads. Give them new radicalized, revolutionary definitions and functions. This is well under way. Look at the mainstream protestant churches! Look at the mayor's office in SF! Look at the courts!
8 posted on
03/01/2004 11:18:34 PM PST by
claudiustg
(Go Sharon! Go Bush!)
To: little jeremiah
(snip)I wonder what the author thinks is the solution if he is against a constitutional amendment and against same sex marriage? Is there a third option? (snip)
OK call me a simpleton but what would be wrong with INFORCING federal and state laws already on the books?How about arresting these "officials" performing the ceremonies? and letting it be known that these fraudulant unions will not be recognized by any state or federal institution?
25 posted on
03/02/2004 6:25:11 AM PST by
edchambers
(Where are we going and why am I in this hand-basket?)
To: little jeremiah
30 posted on
03/02/2004 11:14:55 AM PST by
EdReform
(Support Free Republic - All donations are greatly appreciated. Thank you for your support!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson