Skip to comments.
Five Reasons Not to Go See The Passion of Christ
The Banner of Truth: Biblical Christianity through Literature ^
| February 19, 2004
| Andrew J. Webb
Posted on 02/27/2004 8:06:42 PM PST by Weirdad
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240, 241-260, 261-280 ... 321-337 next last
To: sakic; CWW
I never knew that Protestants were Satanists. I learned something new today:There are plenty of idiots on FR, but CWW is not one of them.
To: narses
It is amazing how one can know so much about the word of Christ and understand so little. I don't know what he feels he has to gain by preaching to fellow Christians about the rightousness of his interpretations over theirs. The world is a "target rich environment" for the Word of God. He should climb off of his pedestal, pack away his Rolex and get out among the sinners and pagans. Catholics don't need to be born a 3rd time.
To: Aquinasfan; BibChr; narses
The Bread, body and blood refer to the Holy Spirit. It is analogy. By eating the components of the food become part of the being. The fact that one does not obfuscate that fact in ritual, does not mean they do not partake of the Holy Spirit. At the Last Supper He requested His people to, "do this in remembrance of Me." As long as folks gather in His name, that is what is important.
To: Krodg
I can't thank you enough....:)
To: Weirdad
As Mel Gibson, a devout Roman Catholic put it so well; "It reflects my beliefs."
Hmmm...I'm no expert on all the variants, but Mel Gibson is a
"traditional" Catholic -- part of a group that basically disagrees with
the Vactican II changes.
A fair and even-handed article in The Los Angeles Times Sunday Magazine
covered this a few weeks ago.
The idea that "The Passion" would have a Roman Catholic "flavor" shouldn't be a
suprise to anyone who gets a standard dose of news from TV, radio, newspapers or periodicals.
245
posted on
02/28/2004 12:04:56 PM PST
by
VOA
To: CindyDawg
This is a great article.
Becky
To: spunkets
At the Last Supper He requested His people to, "do this in remembrance of Me." The Last Supper was a Seder meal. Jews believe that the Seder meal "makes present" the exodus from Egypt. It is more than simple remembrance. Ask a Jew, they'll tell you. This is the sense in which Jesus was speaking. The breaking of bread "makes present" Jesus' sacrificial death on the Cross. This is what Catholics believe. And scripture shows that St. Paul believed it too.
247
posted on
02/28/2004 2:56:58 PM PST
by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
To: Natural Law
I don't know what he feels he has to gain by preaching to fellow Christians about the rightousness of his interpretations over theirs. He should climb off of his pedestal, pack away his Rolex and get out among the sinners and pagans.Here's something to think about:
Hebrews 5:11:-6:3
"We have much to say about this, but it is hard to explain because you are slow to learn. In fact, though by this time you ought to be teachers, you need someone to teach you the elementary truths of God's word all over again. You need milk, not solid food! Anyone who lives on milk, being still an infant, is not acquainted with the teaching about righteousness. But solid food is for the mature, who by constant use have trained themselves to distinguish good from evil.
Therefore let us leave the elementary teachings about Christ and go on to maturity, not laying again the foundation of repentance from acts that lead to death, and of faith in God, instruction about baptisms, the laying on of hands, the resurrection of the dead, and eternal judgment. And God permitting, we will do so."
The Hebrews by this time were not recent converts. The author of Hebrews is saying "C'mon guys! Time to learn more and dig deeper into the Word!" This article written by Andrew Webb probably should not have been posted without the clarification that its intended audience is not for 'sinners and pagans', but it is for those who are already born-again Evangelicals and who are seeking to gain more discernment about theological matters. Protestants and Catholics believe different things about Salvation. He's pointing out to his fellow Protestant Evangelicals those differences. If it were a movie such as the "Jesus Film" I am certain Catholic theologians would have issues with it that they would like to point out to their fellow Catholics.
To: agrarianlady
That is interesting, but what has it got to do with demeaning and diminishing the faith of others?
To: Ronzo
My credentials are simple: the Holy Spirit, Scripture, and some good systematic theology courses.
Many evangelical churches have their own heresies.
250
posted on
02/28/2004 5:23:20 PM PST
by
rwfromkansas
("Men stumble over the truth, but most pick themselves up as if nothing had happened." Churchill)
To: jospehm20
"Sounds like this guy has a real problem with Catholics."
Sounds that way to me as well.
251
posted on
02/28/2004 5:45:08 PM PST
by
Romish_Papist
(Lurker for three years, finally registered, love this place!)
To: Weirdad
I imagine you have by now recieve a bunch of flack over this article (and I have not read past page one, to be honest), but I wanted to thank you for posting it. It was a good read and does make some good points worthy of mentally noting.
I appreciate your posting it.
Keep Freepin...
LowOiL
252
posted on
02/28/2004 5:51:44 PM PST
by
LowOiL
(Christian and proud of it !)
To: Nick Danger
Wonderful post!
253
posted on
02/28/2004 5:52:48 PM PST
by
Romish_Papist
(Lurker for three years, finally registered, love this place!)
To: nmh
I have enjoyed your posts here. Thanks.
254
posted on
02/28/2004 6:00:54 PM PST
by
LowOiL
(Christian and proud of it !)
To: nmh
Josephus did state that Jesus was unattractive. You may want to read through his book.I think you're thinking of Celsus, not Josephus.
To: agrarianlady
Great comment.
256
posted on
02/28/2004 10:52:29 PM PST
by
Weirdad
(A Free Republic, not a "democracy" (mob rule))
To: spunkets
the Seder meal "makes present" the exodus from Egypt. Should be, "makes present the Passover event."
257
posted on
02/29/2004 6:03:57 AM PST
by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
To: Weirdad
The Second reason why all visual representations of Jesus are lies is that they can never hope to represent the glory of Christ in His true nature. The best an image of Jesus can do is to represent him as a man, and while Jesus was truly a man, He was not merely a man. Jesus was also God, and no artist or filmmaker who has ever lived could hope to create an image that captures the true Glory of Jesus as God. Except for the harsh term "lie" I'd say this is an outstanding point.
258
posted on
02/29/2004 7:54:44 AM PST
by
Zechariah11
("so they weighed for my price thirty pieces of silver.")
To: P-Marlowe
My cry is that Christ's blood will truly be upon me and my children... and my children's children. Amen.
To: Weirdad
Reason # 6...................................
It's just a remake of "Life of Brian"
260
posted on
02/29/2004 8:07:46 AM PST
by
WhiteGuy
(Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240, 241-260, 261-280 ... 321-337 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson