To: Blood of Tyrants
Every time this topic comes up, I can't help but remember seeing that fossil on TV of a crocodile which scientists claimed to be over 2 million years older than dinosaurs. The crocodile in the fossil looked EXACTLY like the ones today. "Jes how long does this evolution thingy take before sumpin changes?" LOL
49 posted on
02/27/2004 1:41:23 PM PST by
moonman
To: moonman
Turn off the tv. Read. It's much more informative.
51 posted on
02/27/2004 1:45:59 PM PST by
atlaw
To: moonman
The crocodile in the fossil looked EXACTLY like the ones today. "Jes how long does this evolution thingy take before sumpin changes?" LOL
Wow. Biology 101 (moonman vernacular): If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
Crocs have been relatively unchanged because they've never needed to as a top predator in their stable niche. They've had no selective pressures on them to cause any change in their allele frequencies for quite some time, though they have gotten smaller over the Ages.
What dope would not explain this on TV?
To: moonman
Every time this topic comes up, I can't help but remember seeing that fossil on TV of a crocodile which scientists claimed to be over 2 million years older than dinosaurs. The crocodile in the fossil looked EXACTLY like the ones today. "Jes how long does this evolution thingy take before sumpin changes?" LOL
What is your specific problem with this? Is it that you don't believe that the fossil was that old? Or is it that you don't believe that natural selection could possibly keep a life form static for that long if other animals were evolving? Or is it something else?
To: moonman
Clearly you lack even a fundamental understanding of the mechanics of evolution.
77 posted on
02/27/2004 2:05:21 PM PST by
jayef
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson