To: Blood of Tyrants
No, that is an amendment to ban armor pierce with a question of whether the AG wants to test bullets to see if they will penetrate a vest.
51 posted on
02/27/2004 10:05:47 AM PST by
philetus
(Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get)
To: philetus; Shooter 2.5
Because there is "no controlling legal aguthority," to use a Clinton-era phrase, the AG, or any future AG (like a Janet Reno) could arbitrarily designate a .22 Short as having the potential to penetrate body armor, thereby prohibiting its sale and possession.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson