Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ejdrapes
I'm seeing the film tonight, and I have the sinking feeling that I'm going to end up agreeing with some of what Hitchens says. A film which focuses entirely on the beating and crucifixion of Jesus, without providing any lead-up or context, might very well fail from an artistic and dramatic point of view. Another thing: the film is supposed to be historically accurate, but stills from the movie depict Jesus carrying the entire cross, not just the crosspiece, and very few scholars think that's how it was. Also, an out-take shows the nails about to be driven through the palms of his hands, whereas most scholars believe they were driven through the wrists.
330 posted on 02/27/2004 8:06:30 AM PST by Steve_Seattle ("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Steve_Seattle
the film is supposed to be historically accurate

I've never seen this claim. I've seen the claim that it is Biblically accurate though.

449 posted on 03/01/2004 1:09:05 AM PST by stands2reason (Liberal lurkers: stick around, you may just grow a brain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson