[Patrick1]

Sullivan is consistent on his conservative positions. He is pro-war on terror and anti big government spending, as am I.

He thinks Bush is the man to keep on terror but thinks people will vote against him because of a prescription drug plan and other compassionate conservative moves he has made.

I disagree with Sullivan there. I think now as I did two years ago that the issue of this campaign will be the war on terror. I have e-mailed Sullivan to express this view that it is unlikely that Islamist Fascist would consider gay marriages a top priority and the battle over that can be fought after the war is won.

I'll cut him some slack on the gay marriage issue. He can rant on that all he wants that is his right. I just hope he doesn't lose sight of the issue and that is the total defeat of Islamist Fascism.

Sullivan is still a good pundit I just wouldn't want him as my pastor.

[Miles Vorkosigan]

He only supports the War on Terror in order to get attention. On everything else he's down-the-line hard left.

[CatoRenasci]

If you've read his blog in the past few days, it's clear that he will no longer support Bush. For him, homosexual rights are more important than the War on Terror and Islamofascism. If he were to say something along the lines of "well, I really think Bush is wrong here, but since he is the only candidate who is serious about the war, I have to support him" I'd cut him some slack. But he's done the opposite. Read his blog.

Although, I do find hypocrisy shown by the contrast between his homosexual cruising ads and his writings in favor of a more conservative homosexual life sytle as distasteful in him as I always have in the Jim Baker's and others on the religious right.

[faithincowboys]

Actually, Sullivan seems to think the WOT is not too important now--it has been a major retreat.