Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hideous, Stupid and Barbaric (Anti-Passion Alert!)
Toronto Sun ^ | 2/25/2004 | Michael Coren

Posted on 02/26/2004 10:06:37 AM PST by Pyro7480

Last week, I wrote a preamble column about Mel Gibson's new movie, The Passion of the Christ. I said that I was extraordinarily optimistic. In fact, I have never before wanted to enjoy a movie so much.

But I was wrong. Oh, how wrong I was.

I love God and Jesus with all my heart, but for the life of me I cannot embrace this film.

Forgive me if I cause offence, but I have to be honest.

This is some pre-Vatican II Roman Catholic blood cult. It is populated with medieval-type caricatures, screaming out of context, laughing at suffering.

Everyone is gruesome and grotesque, apart from a handful of people such as the Virgin Mary, Mary Magdalene and the apostle John. Mary, by the way, is hardly off of the screen, when in fact she is seldom mentioned in the Gospel accounts.

Herod is some cross-dressing lunatic, the Pharisee leaders, some of the brightest men of the age, are all obscene brutes and the Roman soldiers and the mob resemble crazed gargoyles.

No, no, no! The point has been completely missed. Hate me if you like, but please listen. The point is this:

We would have crucified Him. We would crucify Him. You, me, us. We'd smile, be tolerant and loving, do the right thing as we see it, and crucify Him. Then go home to hug our children and talk about how bad the world had become.

Evil seduces and beguiles. It is frequently attractive. If it was as ugly as director Gibson has portrayed, Jesus would not have had to die in agony. And agony is what it was.

Modern Christians have tended to play down the blood and gore of the Messiah's death. But Gibson compensates to such an extreme that he gives us a virtual fetish.

Indeed, the scene where a Roman soldier plunges his spear into Christ's side is, I am sorry, almost like something out of Monty Python. The soldier and those around him shower in the water and blood that cascades out of Yeshua's body.

I suppose we should not be surprised. Gibson made Braveheart and The Patriot, with all of their disembowelings, throat cuttings and, of course, massive historical absurdities. Somehow I thought he'd be more sophisticated with something this important.

The shame of it all is that we know more about what really happened 2000 years ago now than we have done since shortly after the events actually took place. We think in nuance and truth. Not Gibson. Nor does he appear to have read any of the books written in the past 50 years that make the Gospel story so believable, so fleshy and, thus, so convincing.

One example: Barabas. He was a Zealot leader, possibly a local aristocrat. We read our Hebrew and Greek, know about Essenes, Sadducees and Jewish life and culture. We understand. Yet here he is portrayed as a dribbling psychotic. As are most of the Jews in the movie.

So, is it anti-Semitic? Not really. Jews are generally shown as hideous, stupid and barbaric, but then so are the Romans.

Apart from Pontius Pilate, who is here compassion embodied. The thing is, he was a notorious killer who crucified thousands of people without a second thought.

Movie-making requires subtlety, and The Passion is relentlessly violent and nasty. There is no rhythm, no chance for light and purpose and meaning to shine through.

Yes, meaning. More than pain and suffering, so much more.

The flashbacks seem, with one touching exception depicting Jesus as a child, to be mere attempts to push Catholic eucharistic theology onto the audience.

There are vile moments, resembling outtakes from some remake of The Exorcist. A mob of Jewish children morph into tiny devils with murderous faces. Maggots eat away at a dead mule. Satan creeps around, worms crawling up his nose, carrying a perverse baby with hairy back and adult features. None of this is Scriptural, of course. It is also so, well, so anti-humanity.

I wanted majesty and pathos but was given clumsiness and thumping. Yet God's grace and His love still surround me.

If the movie works for you, I am happy. For me, it is prayer, Bible and a dwelling in a God-given imagination that this hyped Hollywood product can never rival.

Michael Coren is a Toronto-based writer and broadcaster. He can be emailed at info@michaelcoren.com and his web site is michaelcoren.com.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: canada; catholic; melgibson; moviereview; passion; thepassion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-146 last
To: PoisedWoman
Recently, for example, word came down from Rome that altar girls were no longer permissible.

And I cheered at this.

141 posted on 03/01/2004 9:28:16 AM PST by cyncooper ("Maybe they were hoping he'd lose the next Iraqi election")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Paulus Invictus
There is no mention of any Mary being seen along the route to Golgotha.

Well, since she is certainly placed at the crucifixion, one can deduce she followed her Son there.

142 posted on 03/01/2004 9:31:00 AM PST by cyncooper ("Maybe they were hoping he'd lose the next Iraqi election")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: PoisedWoman
Though I think they've decided altar girls can remain...I'll have to check. But when I heard they were considering disallowing this practice I did not mind.
143 posted on 03/01/2004 9:38:12 AM PST by cyncooper ("Maybe they were hoping he'd lose the next Iraqi election")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: geopyg
As a parent, I know that I would probably have been much like Mary. Although I would hope that I would have stuck up for my son publicly. However, perhaps Mary as a woman knew she wouldn't be able to sway anyone. Or perhaps she knew that Jesus could just work a miracle and get out of his "predicament".

She knew He was to die, that is why she did not interfere, but was there for Him.

144 posted on 03/01/2004 10:02:20 AM PST by cyncooper ("Maybe they were hoping he'd lose the next Iraqi election")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
I forgive you Micheal Coren for you're sillyness.. after all you're only a Canadian..
Beware: Democracy(mob rule) can make you ignorant..
145 posted on 03/01/2004 10:53:20 AM PST by hosepipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Limited role??? How about major role??? There would be no Jesus Christ if Mary had not agreed to be the handmaid of the Lord.

You can make lots of arguments with semantics. But, if you actually read the new testament, the reality is that Mary plays a very, very limited role. This is especially true as compared to the disciplies. Uh yeah, obviously giving birth to Jesus is significant, but in terms of the numbers of times she is mentioned, the number of teachings that involve her, etc, her role is very limited.
146 posted on 03/01/2004 7:39:05 PM PST by Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-146 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson