Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/26/2004 9:29:10 AM PST by RockChucker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last
To: RockChucker
BUSH THIS ONE NEEDS A VETO.
2 posted on 02/26/2004 9:31:26 AM PST by jocko12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RockChucker
It is getting to the point that Californication along with New Pork needs to leave the Union, or the people need to forcibly remove these statists from their position of power.

Boxer does not deserve to be the servant of any American. It is obvious that she desires to be served.

Blessings, Bobo
4 posted on 02/26/2004 9:34:00 AM PST by bobo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan
ping
5 posted on 02/26/2004 9:34:06 AM PST by KantianBurke (Principles, not blind loyalty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RockChucker; Admin Moderator
This isnt breaking news
6 posted on 02/26/2004 9:34:13 AM PST by Lunatic Fringe ("Fellow citizens, we cannot escape history." -Abraham Lincoln, 1862)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RockChucker
How do democrats do this? And who come republicans can't do this in reverse?
7 posted on 02/26/2004 9:35:02 AM PST by 2banana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RockChucker
I'm on your side, but on the comparison to the AWB, I'd rather be able to have future generations able to buy rifles suitable for defending freedom, and take the risk that I get nabbed for the unlocked shotgun under my bed.
8 posted on 02/26/2004 9:35:22 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed (Your Friendly Freeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RockChucker
Would you happen to have a source for this info?
9 posted on 02/26/2004 9:35:22 AM PST by Wissa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RockChucker
I see a VETO if it does pass Congress: Bush Seeks Protection from Gun Dealers (Bush doesn't want AWB included in legislation)
10 posted on 02/26/2004 9:35:45 AM PST by demlosers (Ann Coulter: Liberals simply can't grasp the problem Lexis-Nexis poses to their incessant lying.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: *bang_list
I'm looking for something on thomas.loc.gov to verify this.
15 posted on 02/26/2004 9:37:44 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed (Your Friendly Freeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RockChucker; Admin Moderator
? source ?
18 posted on 02/26/2004 9:38:59 AM PST by DefCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RockChucker
If this passes, it will be a good idea to shoot in the back a thief who is fleeing with your gun.

(And do they really think that a little cable lock can't be cut off by a thief before he sells or uses the gun?)
22 posted on 02/26/2004 9:41:30 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed (Your Friendly Freeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RockChucker
If this is true, I expect the "If it can be proven that your gun was not stored properly" will place the burden of proof on the gun owner. Guilty until your prove yourself innocent that you stored your gun as mandated by Barbara Boxer.

Does anyone have the full text of the Boxer amendment?
23 posted on 02/26/2004 9:41:50 AM PST by Fun Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RockChucker
Curiosity: what's the substance of the core (Gun Manuf. Liability) legislation, anyway: was IT a decent bill before this?
27 posted on 02/26/2004 9:43:37 AM PST by alancarp (NASCAR: Where everything's made up and the points don't matter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RockChucker
Here's a source for this story:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2004/02/26/national1209EST0603.DTL
29 posted on 02/26/2004 9:44:39 AM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RockChucker; All
BTTT!
31 posted on 02/26/2004 9:46:40 AM PST by MagnusMaximus1 (the issues of "God, guns, gays and abortion" WILL decide who wins or loses in 2004.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RockChucker
I agree, it's more worse than original AWB. The Boxer Amendment treats gun owners as criminals.
32 posted on 02/26/2004 9:47:20 AM PST by demlosers (Ann Coulter: Liberals simply can't grasp the problem Lexis-Nexis poses to their incessant lying.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RockChucker
Its DOA in the House with anti-gun provisions like this one attached.
33 posted on 02/26/2004 9:47:54 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RockChucker; Admin Moderator; DefCon; Lunatic Fringe; Wissa; hellinahandcart; Cboldt
This story needs a link. (Posted about 20-25 minutes ago)
Here's one:

http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000103&sid=aWC_t3ogOiKA&refer=us

U.S. Senate Adopts Measure to Require Safety Locks on Guns
Feb. 26 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. Senate voted 70-27 to require gun manufacturers such as Smith & Wesson Holding Corp. and Sturm, Ruger & Co. Inc. to sell to equip all handguns with child-safety locks.


36 posted on 02/26/2004 9:50:46 AM PST by FBD (...Please press 2 for English...for Espanol, please stay on the line...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RockChucker
It would seem that the amendment to require sale of guns with locks (which is already occuring) is very different from the notion of fining citizens for the criminal acts of others who steal their unlocked guns.

I'd love to see the text. thomas.loc.gov has nothing from today, and the only proposed gun-related amendments to the bill relate to allowing law enforcement officers to concealed carry in states where peons are prohibited.
48 posted on 02/26/2004 9:58:08 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed (Your Friendly Freeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RockChucker
That's it. These people can go to hell. They do not know what "shall not be infringed" means and the courts are not doing their job. Locked and loaded means ready for immediate use when needed by me, my wife, or by either of my daughters when they are home alone. If we are not home the government is not going to tell me how to lock and secure anything and that is an invasion of privacy and an assualt on liberty. What I store in a gun safe and leave out of the safe ready for use and self protection is non of anyones business but my own.
57 posted on 02/26/2004 10:02:25 AM PST by Mat_Helm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson