To: Destro
You are the lover of mama's skirts - the biggest skirt there is - The FCC - it is you who praised censorship - as long as it is not against you right? The FCC didn't pull Stern off the air. His boss did.
That's not "censorship." It's just good business.
218 posted on
02/25/2004 6:52:12 PM PST by
sinkspur
(Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
To: sinkspur
It is bad business because he makes them money and is done to avoid pressure from the FCC. If I owned CC stock right now I would be pissed.
239 posted on
02/25/2004 7:20:00 PM PST by
Destro
(Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
To: sinkspur
Yeah sink buddy, and you also know that the FCC is twisting arms in response to the superbowl nipple incident.
FCC needs to be disbanded or severely gutted along with a few other federal soviet "bureaus" that work to control education, working conditions, health and human services, social policy enforcement and the like.
Socialistic expansion of the central government is NOT good...
I got NO love for howard.
The FCC should not be twisting arms to get tape delays on all programming so that federal police can monitor and restrict unauthorized broadcasting of things that a central government may or may NOT approve of.
EVERY power given to government, WILL without exception be abused. This is not a good idea. Turn howard off. When you can no longer choose to turn him off, I will agree that the fcc can pressure clear channel to pull his broadcast. Until then, we don't need THAT kind of power in a soviet style press-politbureau.
240 posted on
02/25/2004 7:21:05 PM PST by
Robert_Paulson2
(smaller government? you gotta be kidding!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson