1 posted on
02/25/2004 10:35:21 AM PST by
ambrose
To: ambrose
Must be the gay thing....
2 posted on
02/25/2004 10:36:47 AM PST by
KQQL
(@)
To: ambrose
I conducted a poll yesterday and it came out Bush 100% Kerry -10%. I randomly called 10 friends and 20 familly members. I asked are you voting for Bush or that Commie Kerry? Then I sang this song before they could answer.
"The Little Old Commie from Massachusetts"
Sung to Jan and Deans Little Old Lady from Pasadena
Its the Little Old Commie from Massachusetts.
The Little Old Commie form Massachusetts.
Go Kerry, Go Kerry, Go Kerry Go
Hes not worried bout his record cause he has two sets.
Go Kerry, Go Kerry, Go Kerry Go
He as slipry as grease up in DC town,
He will vote the bill up and then hell vote it back down.
Chorus:
And everybodys saying that he offers the most threats.
Thats the Little Old Commie from Massachusetts.
He takes both sides, yes he takes both sides.
Hes the biggest dang liar up in DC Town.
Hes the Little Old Commie from Massachusetts.
Its the Little Old Commie from Massachusetts.
If you hear him speakin out dont pay attention.
Go Kerry, Go Kerry, Go Kerry Go
In a minute or so hell just change direction.
Go Kerry, Go Kerry, Go Kerry Go
The man aint trusted in either House.
Cause he always talks out both sides of his mouth.
Chorus:
And everybodys saying that he offers the most threats.
Thats the Little Old Commie from Massachusetts.
He takes both sides, yes he takes both sides.
Hes the biggest dang liar up in DC Town.
Hes the Little Old Commie from Massachusetts.
Musical Interlude:
Go Kerry, Go Kerry, Go Kerry Go
Go Kerry, Go Kerry, Go Kerry Go
We need to send him home to his heiress wife.
Cause hes got no business in public life.
Chorus:
And everybodys saying that he offers the most threats.
Thats the Little Old Commie from Massachusetts.
He takes both sides, yes he takes both sides.
Hes the biggest dang liar up in DC Town.
Hes the Little Old Commie from Massachusetts.
Go Kerry, Go Kerry, Go Kerry Go
Go Kerry, Go Kerry, Go Kerry Go
Go Kerry, Go Kerry, Go Kerry Go
Go Kerry, Go Kerry, Go Kerry Go
Go Kerry, Go Kerry, Go Kerry Go
Go Kerry, Go Kerry, Go Kerry Go
Fade
Conspiracy Guy 2/24/04
This poll has no margin for error and is totally correct and scientific.
CG
4 posted on
02/25/2004 10:40:02 AM PST by
Conspiracy Guy
(Conspiracy Guy's comments may not reflect his own opinions.)
To: ambrose
I hope Rasmussen has improved his accuracy since 2000. Interesting how the gap narrows over the weekend and widens during the week. Not sure if current numbers reflect any reaction to Bush's speech the other night.
7 posted on
02/25/2004 10:41:07 AM PST by
zook
To: ambrose
JMHO... The fact that polls show Bush ahead of Kerry at all at this point -- when W has done next to nothing in the campaign realm -- should scare the urine out of the D strategists. (Though it undoubtedly thrills one HRC....)
8 posted on
02/25/2004 10:41:24 AM PST by
r9etb
To: ambrose
You can tell when Bush/Kerry Rasmussen poll moves away from the weekend, Bush maintains the lead.
15 posted on
02/25/2004 10:45:08 AM PST by
demlosers
(More two-face from horse face.)
To: ambrose
Did we have daily tracking this early in 2000?
22 posted on
02/25/2004 10:55:06 AM PST by
Timesink
(Smacky is power.)
To: ambrose
These polls mean jack right now. Why is everyone getting all worked up about them?
33 posted on
02/25/2004 11:32:20 AM PST by
petercooper
(America - where your problems aren't your fault, they're someone else's.)
To: ambrose
Bush is on the a run.
To: ambrose
my guess is GWB will never be behind Kerry again.
43 posted on
02/25/2004 12:05:53 PM PST by
The Wizard
(democrats are enemies of America)
To: ambrose
stop publishing these idiotic polls, figure this out.
1.If Bush's poll show he is going to landslide do you think you will sit through all the commercials on the nightly news?
2.Bush's job approval rating is still in the high 50's and these polls show below 50% why?
3. Whose interest would it be in to fudge the numbers of polling data? a) the news media with 10's of millions of advertizing dollars at stake b) the democraps who are also in the news media c) the republicans?
To: ambrose
Remember back to 16 years ago today...February 25, 1988.
After a slow start, a liberal Democrat from Massachusetts began steamrollering towards the Democratic nomination. His name was Michael Dukakis and he was going to inflict the "Massachusetts Miracle" upon the nation at large. He was going to end the Reagan/Bush era.
The polls were showing it too. Mike Dukakis enjoyed double-digit leads over George H.W. Bush right through the middle of summer. Surely George Bush didn't have a chance against this guy. Or so everybody thought.
I bring those memories back again to show just how meaningless polls are at this stage. Dukakis led the polls during a good part of the 1988 campaign but ended up losing in a blowout. John Kerry could well go down in defeat by Walter Mondale or George McGovern proportions by the time the election rolls around, despite how he is polling today.
16 years ago today, most Americans did not yet know just how bad Mike Dukakis was. It wasn't until after the GOP convention that people started finding out. Many outside Massachusetts still don't realize how bad he would have been for the country had he been elected.
Consider that Mike Dukakis was the very last Democrat governor that Massachusetts has had. Since 1990, Massachusetts has elected nothing but Republican governors because the last thing we want around here is "another Dukakis." Perhaps the candidacy of John Kerry will result in the fact that he will be the last Democrat senator Massachusetts will see for a while. Let's hope so.
49 posted on
02/25/2004 12:50:26 PM PST by
SamAdams76
(I do not like the new "Starbucks-style" coffee lids at Dunkin' Donuts)
To: ambrose; KQQL; Conspiracy Guy; genghis; LS; zook; AmishDude; johniegrad; dirtboy; demlosers; ...
Standard Disclaimer One:
As predicters of voter behavior in November, polls in February are meaningless.
Standard Disclaimer Two:
We will NEVER know which pollsters correctly called the 2000 election because the election results were skewed by the media's early call of Florida for Gore [This call came BEFORE polls closed in Florida and in the SouthWest/West, suppressing Republican turn out in ALL of the aforementioned areas. Most pundits now agree that this early call cost President Bush the popular vote and several electoral votes!]
NOTE: While we will NEVER know who made the best call in the 2000 election, we do know that Zogby -- the 'superstar' of the 2000 election -- blew most of his predictions for the 2002 elections (particularly the gubernatorial race in Florida)!
TWO POINTS:
1.) Two-day 'snap shot' polls are UNRELIABLE measures of public opinion [MOST Gallup polls, ALL FoxNews/Opinion Dynamics polls, ALL Newsweek polls, ALL CBSNews polls, SOME ABCNews/WashingtonPost polls (including the most recent/heavily publicized poll) AND MOST Quinnipiac polls are two-day quickies!].
Conversely, polls conducted over multiple days -- with accurate 'weighting' procedures -- are infinitely more VALID [ALL Rasmussen polls, ALL Annenberg polls, MOST Zogby polls, and SOME Ipsos-Reid polls are conducted over multiple days with LARGER than average samples -- typically, larger samples yield lower margins of error!]
2.) Rasmussen's recent polling results closely track results gleaned by the following pollsters:
ZOGBY
2/12-15/04
Likely Voters/MOE +/- 2.8
GWB Approval Ratings:
Red States -- 55% Excellent/Good
(translates to an approval rating proximating 60%)
Blue States-- 47% Excellent/Good
Head-to-Head Match-up:
Red States -- GWB 51% Kerry 39% (+12)
Blue States -- GWB 46% Kerry 47% (-1)
http://zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=808 ANNENBERG
2/11-19/04
Adults/MOE +/- 2
GWB Approval Rating
55% approve 42% disapprove (+13)
over 60% believe the President is a strong leader
44% disapprove of Kerry's antiwar activities
40% approve
62% believe that President Bush fulfilled his National Guard responsibilities
38% do not
17% who disapprove of Kerry's antiwar activities also indicate that this disapproval will matter a 'great deal' when they vote in November
12% who said President Bush shirked his NG responsibilities also said this would matter a 'great deal' when they vote in November
http://www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/naes/2004_03_guard-and-vietnam_02-20_pr.pdf
63 posted on
02/25/2004 3:05:02 PM PST by
DrDeb
To: ambrose
After only announcing the gloves are coming off... can't wait till there's some actual campaign commercials and the like...
To: ambrose
Remember fellow freepers, if Kerry gets the nomination and he tanks to, say 30, in the polls the RATS will pull a Torchelli and replace old horse face. Can anybody guess who they would go with? Anybody,.. anybody....Spicole?
67 posted on
02/25/2004 3:32:59 PM PST by
timydnuc
("Give me Liberty, or give me death"!)
To: ambrose
Wow, a big change in the numbers and GW is just getting started.
71 posted on
02/26/2004 4:50:23 AM PST by
mware
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson