Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tpaine
We need to look at how those activists liberal judges got to where they are: they have been appointed by Dem presidents. THIS is the root-cause of the problem: Dem presidents and liberal Congress, who blocks appointment of conservative judges.

There is a very simple solution:

ELECT REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTS AND REPUBLICAN CONGRESS, SO JUDGES, WHO RULE BASED ON THE LAW, NOT LIBERAL ACTIVISM, WILL BE APPOINTED.

Constitutional Amendment is a big thing, it has to be passed, than ratified by the states, etc -- all, because we have a bunch of liberal judges who legislate from the bench. We may pass this Amendment, but what about the next liberal issue the judges take up? We can't keep amending the Constitution about every special issue.

We need to solve the REAL problem, which is the liberal judges on the bench.

That is why it is ESSENTIAL for the conservative agenda, to re-elect President Bush and send him more Republicans to Congress, so conservative judges, who interpret the law, can be nominated, confirmed and appointed.


12 posted on 02/25/2004 10:35:52 AM PST by FairOpinion ("America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our country." --- G. W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: FairOpinion
See my post 11.

Congress has Constitutional authority to realign the courts. Let's get a debate going in Congress to eliminate the current configuration of the courts (and the activist judges who sit on them) and redesign the courts. Then we can have the President nominate a new slate of judges to sit on the new courts.

All perfectly legal and no Constitutional amendment is required.

-PJ

14 posted on 02/25/2004 10:37:52 AM PST by Political Junkie Too (It's not safe yet to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion
Wake up to reality.. The fed judge that just 'ruled' that citizens of DC have no RKBA's was appointed by Bush.
27 posted on 02/25/2004 10:59:54 AM PST by tpaine (I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but the U.S. Constitution defines conservatism; - not the GOP. .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson