I don't know what the amendment's text says, but I will once it's published. And if the amendment turns out to be what you claim it is, I can then begin my condemnation of the Republicans who voted for it.
What you refuse to understand is that nothing is lost by waiting until the evidence is in hand before passing judgement. We will know who voted how, long before the November elections, which is the first opportunity any of us really have to officially register our outrage. Waiting a February day or two for the evidence to be published won't change a damned thing.
But your continued insistence that we must - MUST - RIGHT F'IN NOW - be outraged at the Republican party because some of them voted for an unknown amendment - one which will be known in a very short time - smacks of psy-ops straight out of Moby's playbook.
I've never experienced someone so intent on trying to separate me from voting Republican in my whole life. So you'll excuse me if I ignore your continued baiting and demands for condemation until the evidence is in.
BTW. It looks like for private owners, you are liable under civil proceedings if someone steals your gun and uses it in a crime because you didn't have it locked up.
Text is here:
Not as bad as it could have been, but more than bad enough. This needs to be pulled from the original Bill.