[RockChucker]

It's not that the guns have to be sold with a lock...

It's that the guns MUST, by force of Federal Law, be locked when stored in a home.

If you don't, you pay $2,500 fine and loose your right to keep and bare arms.

You are also now totally liable for any incident that is commited with your gun, if you fail to lock it, such as a theif who stole your gun and shoots someone. If it can be proven that your gun was not stored properly, you are fined $2,500, you loose your 2nd Ammendment rights and you are liable for the injury, damage or death caused by the 3rd party's criminal act.

[Dan from Michigan]

IF that's the case(I'm waiting for bill text), this bill needs to die. I'll still wait for the bill text before I go irate.

Sununu - No

Domincini - Aye

[kt56]

It's not that the guns have to be sold with a lock... It's that the guns MUST, by force of Federal Law, be locked when stored in a home. If you don't, you pay $2,500 fine and loose your right to keep and bare arms. You are also now totally liable for any incident that is commited with your gun, if you fail to lock it, such as a theif who stole your gun and shoots someone. If it can be proven that your gun was not stored properly, you are fined $2,500, you loose your 2nd Ammendment rights and you are liable for the injury, damage or death caused by the 3rd party's criminal act.

If this is the case, the Repubs that voted for this are in BIG trouble,,,BIG, BIG TROUBLE...

[Monty22]

So basically it's now a total gun ban. And this started out as a pro-gun bill?

[tpaine]

It's not that the guns have to be sold with a lock...
It's that the guns MUST, by force of Federal Law, be locked when stored in a home.
If you don't, you pay $2,500 fine and loose your right to keep and bare arms.
You are also now totally liable for any incident that is commited with your gun, if you fail to lock it, such as a theif who stole your gun and shoots someone. If it can be proven that your gun was not stored properly, you are fined $2,500, you loose your 2nd Ammendment rights and you are liable for the injury, damage or death caused by the 3rd party's criminal act.
522 -RC-


______________________________________


Such a 'law' would break the camels back.. It would be time..