Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dan from Michigan
Nope, she is calling this a LAW. You would be required to use it by the sound of it. Enforcement? Sounds mostly like Point of Sale kinda thing, but I'd be willing to bet they would want a penalty for non-comppliance when they stumble on it.
403 posted on 02/26/2004 6:53:28 AM PST by Dead Corpse (For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 398 | View Replies ]


To: Dead Corpse
Sounds mostly like Point of Sale kinda thing

she also said "or require them to be built into the gun"

406 posted on 02/26/2004 6:55:47 AM PST by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 403 | View Replies ]

To: Dead Corpse
There's two things I need to read in the details.

1. Requirement to USE?
2. What KIND of locks(Built in/Mag disconnect?)

If so, I oppose the whole bill. If not, it sucks, but I'll compromise here.

And Boxer is spewing that 25 times horse@#^$ again.

408 posted on 02/26/2004 6:56:05 AM PST by Dan from Michigan ("You know it don't come easy, the road of the gypsy" - Iron Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 403 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson