Skip to comments.
C-Span Alert (Debate begins this morning @ 9:30am on S. 1805 & Assasult Weapons Ban Renewal)
Posted on 02/25/2004 4:47:28 AM PST by conservativefromGa
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 721-740, 741-760, 761-780 ... 921-923 next last
To: looscnnn
Nope. Goes directly after Bushmaster and Bulls Eye Shooter Supply. Bringing up teh supposed missing "238 guns" again. Anyone got the real scope on that?
741
posted on
02/26/2004 1:54:19 PM PST
by
Dead Corpse
(For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
To: looscnnn
Mikluski(?) offering her amendment: "...the snipers obtained a 'one-shot one-kill assault weapon'..."
Single shot rifles are now 'assault weapons'?!
742
posted on
02/26/2004 1:56:22 PM PST
by
Atlas Sneezed
(Your Friendly Freeper Patent Attorney)
To: Beelzebubba
Especially considering it was a STOLEN semi-auto. She didn't really look like the type that has much firearms experience.
Dickhead Durbin up now.
743
posted on
02/26/2004 1:57:21 PM PST
by
Dead Corpse
(For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
To: Dead Corpse
There is only the Boxer Gun Lock amendment that is truly noxious at this point. Didn't Teddy K's "rifle ammunition" ban get through also?
To: Beelzebubba
Senator from Illinois:
"...they had a 'sniper rifle'..."
"gun dealer who could not even account for the gun that was used"...[families wanted to hold dealer responsible for gun dealer's recklessness in court]
"S1805 slams the courhouse door on the victims and their families."
"families don't even have a chace to go after the reckless conduct of these dealers..."
745
posted on
02/26/2004 1:59:22 PM PST
by
Atlas Sneezed
(Your Friendly Freeper Patent Attorney)
To: Beelzebubba
Mikluski(?) offering her amendment: "...the snipers obtained a 'one-shot one-kill assault weapon'..." Ah yes, the deadly "Bulls-Eye Shooter". Shame on the rest of the Senate, their aids, staff and sergeant-at-arms for not shutting her up.
I'm pretty sure that she would qualify as the 5,342nd use of duct tape.
746
posted on
02/26/2004 2:00:40 PM PST
by
TC Rider
(The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
To: Beelzebubba
"none of the exemptions would be applicable...negligent entrustment and negligence per se don't apply because defendant doesn't have knowldege of..."
"violation of federal or state statute is proximate cause of harm"
747
posted on
02/26/2004 2:01:12 PM PST
by
Atlas Sneezed
(Your Friendly Freeper Patent Attorney)
To: Ronaldus Magnus
Never came up for a vote that I am aware of.
748
posted on
02/26/2004 2:01:39 PM PST
by
Dead Corpse
(For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
To: looscnnn
I have never seen 30-.06 marketed as armor piercing/defeating. There is such a thing. 7.62x51 as well, IIRC. Of course almost any 30-06/.308/.223 will defeat many vests, certainly FMJ practice ammo will, since most vests are designed against the most likely threat, that is handgun rounds.
749
posted on
02/26/2004 2:03:00 PM PST
by
El Gato
(Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
To: El Gato
I can recall that stuff being available surplus by the ton, all through the 60s. As far I know it's still out there now.
This should be a wakeup call to hunters who think this isn't their fight.
750
posted on
02/26/2004 2:04:43 PM PST
by
TC Rider
(The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
To: Beelzebubba
"...the snipers obtained a 'one-shot one-kill assault weapon'..." Unbelievable.
751
posted on
02/26/2004 2:04:59 PM PST
by
StriperSniper
(Manuel Miranda - Whistleblower)
To: Rams82
I believe this is an attempt to ban all high power rifle ammunition NO! You think?
Define high power as anything other than .22 rimfire, (well, long rifle, long, short, CB, etc, but not .22 WMF etc) and you are probably right. Senator Swimmer specifically mentioned the 30-30, and I don't know of any ammo for it that is specifically AP, although it will penetrate many vests.
752
posted on
02/26/2004 2:06:13 PM PST
by
El Gato
(Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
To: Beelzebubba
"bill tries to very narrowly creates an exception: ... I believe we are protecting these families" (rats try to interrupt)
753
posted on
02/26/2004 2:11:32 PM PST
by
Atlas Sneezed
(Your Friendly Freeper Patent Attorney)
To: El Gato
The demoncrats are blurring the issue by confusing true "armor piercing ammunition" meant to penetrate steel and all other ammunition that can bass through woven polymers. Any bullet with a velocity over about 1,500 feet per second can penetrate soft body armor.
To: Beelzebubba
Mikluski offers legal opinions (one from Lloyd Cutler) that bill would require dismissal of sniper victim family lawsuits.
755
posted on
02/26/2004 2:12:57 PM PST
by
Atlas Sneezed
(Your Friendly Freeper Patent Attorney)
To: Dead Corpse
Dead Corpse wrote:
I was listening when Boxer herself read it into the record.
When did that happen? Today? This morning?
When she proposed and "read" the amendment this morning, someone made a motion as she started reading it that the amendment be entered into the record as read. That's common (and it drives me nuts). She did not read more then one sentence of the amendment before that motion was made and accepted without objection.
756
posted on
02/26/2004 2:12:59 PM PST
by
cc2k
To: cc2k
She went on for almost a half an hour talking about WHY it was needed and WHAT it would do. What is your point? Do you like the idea of Boxer tacking crap on to an otherwise good bill? Even if all she wanted to do was put a purple sticker on the side of all guns, I would oppose it.
757
posted on
02/26/2004 2:16:25 PM PST
by
Dead Corpse
(For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
To: Dead Corpse
Frist-Craig #2628 offered.
758
posted on
02/26/2004 2:18:55 PM PST
by
StriperSniper
(Manuel Miranda - Whistleblower)
To: StriperSniper
Puff Daschle wants to read it first...
759
posted on
02/26/2004 2:20:58 PM PST
by
Rams82
To: StriperSniper
Increase penalties for crimes committed with "armor peircing" ammunition. NOt sure who's definition of what the constitutes yet. Quorum call and then they should clue us in...
760
posted on
02/26/2004 2:21:09 PM PST
by
Dead Corpse
(For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 721-740, 741-760, 761-780 ... 921-923 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson