To: rickylc
Good news and bad news. I figured out how to create a seismogram from raw data on the date and time [or any other] from this MOD station in CA. The bad news: nothing on it but a straight line for that parameter. A 5.6 WOULD have been seen on my seismograms as I used every parameter of waveform for both regional and distant settings.
3,862 posted on
03/10/2004 9:57:33 PM PST by
Indie
(The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.")
To: Indie; rickylc
Even changing the "amplitude scaling" to emphasize even small quakes, the 1903 UTC shows no unique event on 2-6-04
3,863 posted on
03/10/2004 10:00:41 PM PST by
Indie
(The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.")
To: Indie
Hmmmmm. A straight line? No random noise? Interesting.
I'm concerned about the strange thing the dog did in the night...
To: Indie
Nice work!!!
Hmmmmmmmmmm.
There's a lot of conflicting info. This Mitch fellow has e-mails and tapes of telephone conversations with USGS personel admitting there was an event, but insisting it wasn't an earthquake, but rather a mine blast.
Is the straight line straighter than it should be?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson