Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cleland's Time At The Front
Various | Hon

Posted on 02/23/2004 11:18:54 AM PST by Hon

Sen. Joseph Maxwell Cleland

Sen. Max Cleland, U.S. senator from Georgia, served in the Army from 1965 to 1968 and as a Signal Corps officer from Oct. 18, 1967 to Dec. 23, 1968 in Vietnam, where he was severely wounded in a grenade explosion. Sen. Cleland was an aide to then-BG Tom Rienzi at Fort Monmouth, N.J., when he volunteered for duty with 1st Air Cavalry Division in Vietnam. First assigned to 1st Cavalry’s Signal battalion, CPT Cleland then volunteered as communications officer for 2d Battalion, 12th Cavalry, which had been chosen for Operation Pegasus – the relief of Khe Sanh – in April 1968. CPT Cleland was on a mountaintop with his Signal team to set up a radio relay when he lost his legs and right arm to a grenade explosion. For Khe Sanh he received the Bronze Star for meritorious service and Silver Star for gallantry in action.

http://www.gordon.army.mil/ocos/rdiv/REGTNCO/cleland.asp

From Khe San Chronology 1962-1972:

Apr 1 [1968] - Operation PEGASUS begins; 2/1 and 2/3 (1st Marines) attack west from Ca Lu along Route 9. Elements of 3d Bde, 1st ACD conduct helo assaults into LZ Mike and Cates. Joint engineer task force begins repair of Route 9 from Ca Lu to Khe Sanh.

Apr 3 - 2d Bde, 1st ACD assaults LZs Tom and Wharton.

Apr 4 - 1/5 CavSqd moves northwest from LZ Wharton and attacks enemy units near old French fort; 1st Battalion, 9th Marines moves southeast from rock quarry and assaults Hill 471.

Apr 5 - 1/9 repulses enemy counterattack on Hill 471 and kills 122 North Vietnamese. 1st Bde, 1st ACD departs Ca Lu and assaults LZ Snapper.

Apr 6 - One company of 3d ARVN Airborne Task Force airlifted to KSCB for the initial link up with defenders. Elements of 2d Bde, 1st ACD relieve 1st Battalion, 9th Marines on Hill 471; 1/9 commences sweep to northwest toward Hill 689.

1st Bde, 1st ACD helilifted north of KSCB. 2/26 and 3/26 push north of combat base; Company G, 2/26 engages enemy force and kills 48 NVA.

Apr 8 - 2/7 CavSqd links up with 26th Marines and conducts official relief of combat base. 1/26 attacks to the west. 3d ARVN Airborne Task Force air assaults into LZ Snake west of Khe Sanh and kills 78 North Vietnamese.

http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/4867/timeline.html

From Doxagora (a post that is meant to be very laudatory of Cleland):

While an aide [to a general] at Forth Monmouth, NJ, Cleland volunteered for a combat tour with the 1st Air Cavalry Division. Once in-theatre, then-Captain Cleland volunteered for a post as communications officer with 2d Battalion, 12th Cavalry in April, 1968. This is meaningful because Cleland knowingly volunteered for Operation PEGASUS.

Some context: At 5:30 AM on January 21st, an NVA artillery barrage hammered away at the forward base of Khe Sanh in what would prove to be a grim foreshadowing of the Tet Offensive, nine days away. By February, enemy fire made it impossible to supply Khe Sanh by C-130, and the military was forced to use paradrops and helicopters in concert with sustained attacks against NVA anti-air emplacements. Outside Khe Sanh, 20,000 NVA soldiers prepared for assault, testing Marine lines with hundreds of men at a time.

Operation PEGASUS was an air assault operation designed to break the back of the NVA at Khe Sanh. 2d Battalion, 12th Cavalry was one of the first two forces into the area, landing on April 1st at LZ WHARTON, just south of a ruined French fort (used by the NVA as the main stronghold for their attacks on the Marines) and the road leading north to Khe Sanh. 2/12 Cav and 1/5 Cav secured WHARTON, which would serve as the staging area for the assault on the fort.

On April 4, two days before the 2/5 Cav attacked the fort from LZ WHARTON, Cleland won his Silver Star. Cleland was at the battalion command post at WHARTON when NVA forces began a rocket and mortar barrage in an attempt to dislodge the Americans from their position. According to Cleland's Silver Star Order:


Capt. Cleland, disregarding his own safety, exposed himself to the rocket barrage as he left his covered position to administer first aid to his wounded comrades. He then assisted in moving the injured personnel to covered positions. Continuing to expose himself, Capt. Cleland organized his men into a work party to repair the battalion communications equipment which had been damaged by enemy fire. His gallant action is in keeping with the highest traditions of the military service, and reflects great credit upon himself, his unit, and the United States Army.

Three days later, the Old French Fort fell. On April 8, American forces set up within the defenses of Khe Sanh. 2/7 Cav moved from LZ THOR (east of WHARTON) and cleared a road to Khe Sanh, allowing American forces to link up with the Marines in the base.

Cleland was ordered to set up a radio relay on a nearby mountain. He and his signals team were airlifted to the site. While disembarking from the helicopter, Cleland saw a grenade that he thought had fallen from his webbing. Cleland tells what happened:

On April 8, 1968, I volunteered for one last mission. The helicopter moved in low. The troops jumped out with M16 rifles in hand as we crouched low to the ground to avoid the helicopter blades. Then I saw the grenade. It was where the chopper had lifted off. It must be mine, I thought. Grenades had fallen off my web gear before. Shifting the M16 to my left hand and holding it behind me, I bent down to pick up the grenade.

A blinding explosion threw me backwards.

The grenade turned out to belong to an inexperienced soldier who had incorrectly set the pin for a hair-trigger detonation.

Seven days later, Operation PEGASUS was ended as the NVA was forced out of the area. From the beginning of the siege to the end of PEGASUS, 730 Americans were killed in action, 2,642 were wounded, and 7 were officially classified as missing in action. A few months later, Khe Sanh was officially abandoned.

Although Cleland's injury occurred in a combat zone, during general combat operations, Cleland was not eligible for a Purple Heart, as his injury did not occur while in direct combat with the enemy. ("Friendly fire" injuries qualify for the Purple Heart only if the fire was directed at an enemy.)

http://www.doxagora.com/


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: maxcleland
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-124 next last
To: Dead Dog
"Could someone here explain "hair-trigger" in the context of a grenade?"

The explanation I have seen is that for the longest while Cleland thought it was his grenade. He was the only person getting off the helicopter at the time, so that would seem to be the likely explanation.

When Cleland appeared on a History Channel program, an ex-Marine named David Lloyd of Annapolis, MD, saw him and said he knew that it was someone else's greande. Lloyd got in touch with Cleland and told him what he believed had happened.

Lloyd said that another Marine new to the front (though of course Cleland was also new to the front) had straightened out the kotter pin on his grenade so that he could pull it more readily. And that this was the grenade that had fallen and Cleland had picked up. When he picked it up the pin fell out.

This was reported in slightly different versions in two South Carolina papers.
81 posted on 02/23/2004 1:24:32 PM PST by Hon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Hon
I agree that the information you've posted is correct, except the title.

My recommended title would be: Cleland's eight days at Khe Sanh.
82 posted on 02/23/2004 1:26:02 PM PST by optimistically_conservative (This tagline recently seen at Taglinus FreeRepublicus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: All
Here are the two articles I mentioned that appeared in the SC press:

http://www.thestate.com/mld/thestate/news/local/7218941.htm
http://www.savannahnow.com/stories/113000/LOCbooksigning.shtml
83 posted on 02/23/2004 1:28:16 PM PST by Hon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: familyofman; Hon
LOL, hey familyofman, that's the dumbest post I've read yet on this board. Well, that's not in immediate danger of being fed to the VK's.
84 posted on 02/23/2004 1:28:27 PM PST by optimistically_conservative (This tagline recently seen at Taglinus FreeRepublicus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Hon
The whole post makes us look small, mean-spirited and willing to mock the service of our military *IF* we don't agree with their ideology.

I'm all in favor of using every trick in the book to discredit the Democrats. Their motives, their lies, their goals and their agenda. BUT there is zero value in highlighting Clelands service. He served. End of case.

(Nudge, nudge...wink, wink...did you hear Bush was AWOL?)

85 posted on 02/23/2004 1:28:50 PM PST by Wheee The People (If this post doesn't make any sense, then it also doubles as a bump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: RicocheT
If you had watched some average soldiers do some really heroic things, and get told that "they were just doing their duty", you may have a different opinion of others [money boys] who were awarded for "just doing their duty".
86 posted on 02/23/2004 1:29:32 PM PST by Chapita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: familyofman
"Way, way too late for that. Plus your explanation is far too contrite to have any meaning. Crawl back into your rat-hole you slimey coward!!!"

Why thank you!

(BTW, family of man sounds so friendly.)
87 posted on 02/23/2004 1:29:59 PM PST by Hon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: optimistically_conservative
I just love showing off my stupid side every now and then. Just keeping it real, ya 'no.
88 posted on 02/23/2004 1:30:06 PM PST by familyofman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Jimmy Valentine's brother
(BTW, you links don't work)

As you can see from the image below, there is no adjustment to the fuse to permit an adjustable detonation time, that is the purpose of the FUSE, it burns at a perdetermined rate and when it gets to the bottom.... BANG

BTW.. For all you fellow VN vets... you yall remember the litte clasp on the safety handle? It may be the years but I just remember them being shipped in those cardboard tubes. Anybody?

89 posted on 02/23/2004 1:30:46 PM PST by Robe (Rome did not create a great empire with meetings, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Dead Dog
I think the hair trigger crap is straightening the pin.

I think we should bring up the Dem's disgusting behavior ridiculing Dole and GHWBush when they cry about "patriotism" and conflate their "heros".
90 posted on 02/23/2004 1:30:58 PM PST by optimistically_conservative (This tagline recently seen at Taglinus FreeRepublicus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Wheee The People
"(Nudge, nudge...wink, wink...did you hear Bush was AWOL?)"

I don't know if you noticed the threads I posted about Bush's AWOL. I don't mean to be immodest, but I did play a small role in getting the truth out about that fabrication.
91 posted on 02/23/2004 1:31:35 PM PST by Hon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Hon
"family of man sounds so friendly"

Man is a killer by nature in case you hadn't noticed. Don't read too much into the obvious.
92 posted on 02/23/2004 1:32:16 PM PST by familyofman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: All
Here's something I posted a little while back which seems appropriate here:

Kerry: "We do not need to divide America over who served and how."
Congressional Record ^ | February 27, 1992 | John Kerry

Posted on 02/15/2004 4:08:10 PM EST by Hon

Speech of John F. Kerry
February 27, 1992
Page S2479 Congressional Record

Mr. President, I also rise today--and I want to say that I rise reluctantly, but I rise feeling driven by personal reasons of necessity--to express my very deep disappointment over yesterday's turn of events in the Democratic primary in Georgia.

I am saddened by the fact that Vietnam has yet again been inserted into the campaign, and that it has been inserted in what I feel to be the worst possible way. By that I mean that yesterday, during this Presidential campaign, and even throughout recent times, Vietnam has been discussed and written about without an adequate statement of its full meaning.

What is ignored is the way in which our experience during that period reflected in part a positive affirmation of American values and history, not simply the more obvious negatives of loss and confusion.

What is missing is a recognition that there exists today a generation that has come into its own with powerful lessons learned, with a voice that has been grounded in experiences both of those who went to Vietnam and those who did not.

What is missing and what cries out to be said is that neither one group nor the other from that difficult period of time has cornered the market on virtue or rectitude or love of country.

What saddens me most is that Democrats, above all those who shared the agonies of that generation, should now be refighting the many conflicts of Vietnam in order to win the current political conflict of a Presidential primary.

The race for the White House should be about leadership, and leadership requires that one help heal the wounds of Vietnam, not reopen them; that one help identify the positive things that we learned about ourselves and about our Nation, not play to the divisions and differences of that crucible of our generation.

We do not need to divide America over who served and how. I have personally always believed that many served in many different ways. Someone who was deeply against the war in 1969 or 1970 may well have served their country with equal passion and patriotism by opposing the war as by fighting in it. Are we now, 20 years or 30 years later, to forget the difficulties of that time, of families that were literally torn apart, of brothers who ceased to talk to brothers, of fathers who disowned their sons, of people who felt compelled to leave the country and forget their own future and turn against the will of their own aspirations?

Are we now to descend, like latter-day Spiro Agnews, and play, as he did, to the worst instincts of divisiveness and reaction that still haunt America? Are we now going to create a new scarlet letter in the context of Vietnam? Certainly, those who went to Vietnam suffered greatly. I have argued for years, since I returned myself in 1969, that they do deserve special affection and gratitude for service. And, indeed, I think everything I have tried to do since then has been to fight for their rights and recognition.

But while those who served are owed special recognition, that recognition should not come at the expense of others; nor does it require that others be victimized or criticized or said to have settled for a lesser standard. To divide our party or our country over this issue today, in 1992, simply does not do justice to what all of us went through during that tragic and turbulent time.

I would like to make a simple and straightforward appeal, an appeal from my heart, as well as from my head. To all those currently pursuing the Presidency in both parties, I would plead that they simply look at America. We are a nation crying out for leadership, for someone who will bring us together and raise our sights. We are a nation looking for someone who will lift our spirits and give us confidence that together we can grow out of this recession and conquer the myriad of social ills we have at home.

We do not need more division. We certainly do not need something as complex and emotional as Vietnam reduced to simple campaign rhetoric. What has been said has been said, Mr. President, but I hope and pray we will put it behind us and go forward in a constructive spirit for the good of our party and the good of our country.

93 posted on 02/23/2004 1:34:06 PM PST by Hon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Hon
I don't know if you noticed the threads I posted about Bush's AWOL. I don't mean to be immodest, but I did play a small role in getting the truth out about that fabrication.

Read 95% of the threads. Major kudos to you. Major! And you are being modest, you played more than a "small" role:-) But no kudos on this thread. It detracts from your other stellar efforts.

94 posted on 02/23/2004 1:36:40 PM PST by Wheee The People (If this post doesn't make any sense, then it also doubles as a bump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Wheee The People
Well, thanks. But this information is the truth. I found it surprising and newsworthy.

And it does inform some of the highly inflammatory comments being made by Cleland and others on his behalf.

As Ann Coulter pointed out, Cleland never portrayed himself as a hero until he thought he could use it to bludgeon Republicans. (I paraphrase.)

He started with Chambliss but he has ratcheted it up for Bush.
95 posted on 02/23/2004 1:40:05 PM PST by Hon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Hon
grenade that had fallen and Cleland had picked up. When he picked it up the pin fell out.

This still dosen't wash

#1. As noted elsewhere in this post you have any where from 4 to 12 seconds before the thing goes off, AFTER THE PIN IS PULLED AND THE SAFETY LEVER IS RELEASED.

#2. The #1 rule in dealing with grenades is YOU DON"T PICK "EM UP.... you YELL... "GRENADE!!!!" AND HIT THE DIRT

Picking them up and tossing them away to save everyones life only happens in the movies.

That said, the ONLY time I saw a guy do that it went off just as he stooped over to pick it up... just like Max, ....."cept Max was luckier

96 posted on 02/23/2004 1:42:10 PM PST by Robe (Rome did not create a great empire with meetings, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: znix
What matters is that they served.

I think there would be a lot less animosity if the Democrats also took that approach to the President's National Guard service. As for Cleland, my understanding is that he continually raises his military service.... he portrays himself as having been unfairly disparaged as unpatriotic by the Republicans when he was defeated for office, and then points to his terrible injuries as his defense, in order to trash the Republicans. As terrible as his injuries are, they don't entitle him to elective office for life, nor do they make anyone voting against him a hater of disabled persons, veterans, etc. Moreover, if Mr. Cleland wants to cite his military injuries as qualifying him to criticize President Bush's military service, don't you think Mr. Cleland opens his own records to scrutiny? If he claims that they entitle him to speak with authority on an issue, then isn't it a legitimate inquiry? I have yet to see where the Republicans raised this issue.... I thought it came up in response to Mr. Cleland's attacks on President Bush. Incidentally, it would seem to me that Mr. Cleland's injuries, as non-combat related, illustrate the danger inherent in any military service... even, perhaps, the National Guard....

97 posted on 02/23/2004 1:43:54 PM PST by GraceCoolidge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Dead Dog
Remeber how they ripped Dole's paralysis (the pen), and how Bush Sr. was a coward for leaving his TBM without trying to save his mortally wounded gunner.

Exactly! People complain that the RNC doesn't fight back hard enough and that they let the dems get away with everything. Then they turn around and bi*&h when FACTS are presented.

One can't please these people.

98 posted on 02/23/2004 1:44:16 PM PST by Grenada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: znix
"What matters is that they served."

I personally do not think I'm in any position to way moral judgement on anyone's activities in the service of this country.

However, I can't completely agree with yout statement. How should we react if Lt. William Calley were running for office? Should I consider him a better man for the job then Bush? Should I consider his experience superior to an ANG Pilot, or even a non-veteran? I am certain that if I had been a Lt. in any war, Vietnam in particular, I doubt I would have been better than Lt. Calley.

It's not Cleland's valor in the face of the enemy that we're questioning. The question is if he has used a subordinate as a scape goat.

This isn't about their sacrifice, it's about a domonstrated lack of ethics and intergrity from a commissioned officer. I would bet that you have seen the damage done by this combination than any of us non-veterans could ever imagine.

Quite frankly I don't want him, or John "Silver Star for a B-40" Kerry in office...specifically for their actions in Vietnam. I'd prefer Calley.
99 posted on 02/23/2004 1:46:17 PM PST by Dead Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Robe
I'm not disagreeing. I know nothing about it except what I saw in those two articles I posted links to.

I've been told that David Lloyd is a very credible-seeming person. But I still am a bit sceptical about the account.
100 posted on 02/23/2004 1:48:12 PM PST by Hon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-124 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson