To: Sandy; cinFLA
Sandy:
Just pointing out that tpaine's statement doesn't mean he's not familiar with the Barron decision. That's all.
______________________________________
Of course not. What it means is that he wanted me to think he was not familiar with it.
464 -cinflawed-
______________________________________
Sandy, thanks for 'goading' our boy into giving me a good afternoon laugh..
Cin-baby, you've got me dead to rights once again.. Everything I post to you has several different layers of meanings..
How did you know my middle name is Machiavelli?
482 posted on
02/24/2004 2:48:48 PM PST by
tpaine
(I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but the U.S. Constitution defines conservatism; - not the GOP. .)
To: tpaine
Either the 2nd is part of the BOR's or you lied.
484 posted on
02/24/2004 2:52:56 PM PST by
cinFLA
To: tpaine
I have to remind you that you posted that the 2nd amendment was not part of the Bill of Rights. Are you now saying you were lying to bait me?
486 posted on
02/24/2004 2:55:25 PM PST by
cinFLA
To: tpaine
Cin-baby, you've got me dead to rights once again.. Everything I post to you has several different layers of meanings.. I know. You only purpose is to bait and switch and then demonize. Rather sporting of you, chap.
Of course I forgot, I am not supposed to think, just obey King Freeee and Sir TP.
492 posted on
02/24/2004 3:08:47 PM PST by
cinFLA
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson