Replies

But biological evolution is indeed limited to biology. It has been established that the "debate," such as it is, must be limited to biological evolution, which has many more knowns than unknowns, as opposed to the admittedly spotty record of cosmological origins and abiogenesis. The very definition of biological evolution defines it as keeping to biology. The only place where this is twisted and contorted is in creationist tracts, yours, and one other Freeper I can remember.

OK. Biological evolution is limited to biology and not abiogenesis. Do you suggest that there are no theories about how it started?

Do you suggest that there are no theories about how it started?

Yes. I go on record stating there are no currently accepted scientific THEORIES on abiogenesis. There are a multitude of thoughts on it, but no theories.

I assume you are setting me up and will now send some link that uses the colloquial "theory," but I'm fine with that.