Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blam
It seems kinda pointless to me for them to fight over a 1,000-year period which falls into a time frame when carbon-dating has an error margin of at least about 1,000 years :) To quote my ancient Near Eastern history textbook:

"Recent use of dendrochronology for calibration of radiocarbon-derived dates suggests that they deviate increasingly from actual calendar dates, from an error of about 200 years at 1000 B.C. up to an error of about 900 years at 5,000 radiocarbon years B.C. . .Although calibration curves are designed to bring radiocarbon dates in line with actual dates, the limits of these curves currently do not extend earlier than about 5200 B.C."

A. Bernard Knapp, The History and Culture of Ancient Western Asia and Egypt, Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1988, 7

13 posted on 02/20/2004 5:54:56 PM PST by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Fedora
I have come to the conclusion that scientists have to argue so that they can continue to be funded to "prove" their (contrarian) theory.
14 posted on 02/21/2004 10:44:43 AM PST by marsh2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson