Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: reed_inthe_wind
The issue discussed here has nothing to do with Kerry. It has to do with how excited Republicans are to go out and vote for him. He's suggesting we have the "blahs" about Bush. I think there might be merit to his argument.
30 posted on 02/19/2004 8:46:08 AM PST by GraniteStateConservative ("You can dip a pecan in gold, but it's still a pecan"-- Deep Thoughts by JC Watts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: GraniteStateConservative
He's suggesting we have the "blahs" about Bush.

Conservatives should be conserving a little energy (you may interpret this as the "blahs") The Federalist notion of government is buried in a pile of judicial activism. The struggle to regain what has been lost (limited government) is going to be long. Compared to the liberals, conservatives have a long war ahead; the liberals will achieve their victory when they install a free spending Kerry, Edwards or whomever as President of the USA. But conservatives know that the next battle is one important step on the road home. Electing Bush means controlling or at least influencing the courts. Until we change the courts, the balanced budget battles are just a sideshow of an era of bloated government. Each annual budget battle is important but not really critical if the whole ship is off coarse. When the Dem candidate steps into the open, we conservatives will destroy him. Why, because it is step one.

40 posted on 02/19/2004 10:10:24 AM PST by reed_inthe_wind (Vienna said the middlemen come from Ger, Nether,Belg, S Af, Jap,Dub, Mal,USA,Rus,Chin,and Pak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson