You implied that I said Mr. H was drunk when I said no such thing."
You said something about possible alcohol influence. Someone else said he was drunk. I never said you did. If I had been addressing you specifically as saying he was drunk, I'd have quoted you. Regardless, your "possible alcohol influence" is irrelevant. There were no charges for alcohol influence, and if he'd had any they'd have definitely cited him for it and any sane person knows that. So I find your accusation that I slandered quite telling, since that's what you're doing.
BTW, are you a police officer, former or retired?
Every human being has possible alcohol influence, every minute of every day. Alcohol production happens in the body. There were no charges relating to alcohol consumption -- so calling him a "drunk" is left for those who don't have better arguments.
Not slander. It is in Mr. H's petition.