Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Arpege92
These cops did not pull this guy over and they did not just happen upon the scene. A phone call came in to the police department reporting a domestic disturbance....

These cops came upon a pickup truck on the side of a road in a public place. There could be no 'domestic disturbance'. Upon getting out of his car and seeing NO disturbance, all this cop had to do or had the right to do was to ask both parties if everything was alright. He didn't. He asked for ID and that was all he asked for. He was wrong from the gitgo.

The guy did not want to cooperate and he was given chance after chance to comply.

You don't seem to understand. The gentleman was under no compunction or requirement to cooperate with the officer's request for him to produce identification. That is the issue here. The cop has the right to ask but the citizen is NOT required to comply. Because the officer kept asking repeatedly is what caused the problem here.

Upon receiving his 'no', the officer should have taken another course to proceed with his 'investigation'. He had plenty of choices.

189 posted on 02/18/2004 3:28:07 PM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (The way that you wander is the way that you choose. The day that you tarry is the day that you lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]


To: Bloody Sam Roberts
"These cops came upon a pickup truck on the side of the road in a public place."

Wrong, they were dispatched to go and investigate a domestic disturbance....big difference.
195 posted on 02/18/2004 3:33:27 PM PST by Arpege92
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson