Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin
Umm...here you are getting into areas outside my expertise, although I will say that I doubt Mars would be in its particular orbit if it had an icy core - just not dense enough. I suspect that once we establish good seismic stations we will find that Mars has a small core, similar to the Earth's...with very little, if any, seismic activity.

As far as the white stuff being permafrost...you ever seen permafrost or tried to dig through it? Pretty tough stuff. I think we are looking at minerals.

164 posted on 02/16/2004 10:32:55 PM PST by Aracelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies ]


To: Piltdown_Woman; AndrewC
It does look like a mineral deposit of some kind, but unless I'm seeing incorrectly it looks like traces of a similar white substance in the pics from Opportunity in post 156. That post features a great shot of those curious, round clumps everyone's been wondering about as well.

(Not to go "Close Encounters" about those clumps but they DO look SO familiar...remind me of...something...Something from long ago when I was a kid and dug in the dirt...something >kinda< important. LOL)

An experiment that would be visually interesting but probably not of much scientific value would be to have a camera attached to a small box. Dig up some Martian soil, put it in the box, gently bring it up to say 40-60 degrees F (initially - higher later) then watch what happens, as well as test for the release of gases.

Might also have been interesting to mix with some solvent, Earth water. Or just dig a trench, warm it, squirt some water into it and let it go back to ambient temp. That way we could see what water looks like on that far away world.

Of course none of the above are maritan - environmentally friendly.

prisoner6

167 posted on 02/16/2004 10:54:39 PM PST by prisoner6 (Right Wing Nuts hold the country together as the loose screws of the left fall out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]

To: Piltdown_Woman
I suspect that once we establish good seismic stations we will find that Mars has a small core, similar to the Earth's...with very little, if any, seismic activity.

I'm not a geologist, but my WAG theory of why we have tectonic plates moving around on a soft mantle is because we have oceans, and a moon. The moon keeps the stresses moving, which creates heat, and helps "break up" the surface, and the oceans (due to the moon) provide a massive amount of weight constantly shifting back and forth on a daily basis. Mars, having neither a large moon, or oceans, would therefore have very little sub-surface activity other than the static volcanoes. ("Static" in the sense of standing still over the same underground "stuff", not in the "plasma sparks" sense our no-longer-with-us poster waxed obsessive over.)

196 posted on 02/17/2004 7:47:00 AM PST by Don Joe (I own my vote. It's for rent to the highest bidder, paid in adherence to the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson