Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cherry
as far as education goes, people with special gifts should be nurtured, but not to the point where we have the majority of children leaving school without knowing how to read, or write, or knowing basic history so they can be good citizens...

I'm not talking about neglecting the majority. I'm talking about the disproportionate funding that goes to the education of the bottom 5% (ie, "special ed"), who also happen to be most disruptive to the learning environment

If we took the extra money that currently goes to special-ed, and used more of it to ensure that poor-but-gifted students developed to their full potential, the US would be more prosperous. And by reversing the "mainstreaming" of disruptive special-ed kids into classrooms where the other kids actually would like to learn, we can stop holding back the majority as well.

90 posted on 02/16/2004 1:43:03 PM PST by SauronOfMordor (No anchovies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: SauronOfMordor
If we took the extra money that currently goes to special-ed, and used more of it to ensure that poor-but-gifted students developed to their full potential, the US would be more prosperous. And by reversing the "mainstreaming" of disruptive special-ed kids into classrooms where the other kids actually would like to learn, we can stop holding back the majority as well.

Note that these policies are the result of court cases, and teachers, administrators, and school systems pretty well have their hands tied on how to deal with special ed. students.

95 posted on 02/16/2004 3:11:48 PM PST by Amelia (I have trouble taking some people seriously.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson