[Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh]

Like I said, I'm no doctor, and the Courts are handling the issue. And I agree that the situation creeps me out, and I have felt uneasy about the husband and his motivation.

Don't lose track of the point. Saying that he's trying to kill her, as opposed to withdrawing her life support, is a big difference.

[mtbopfuyn]

Here, kitty kitty! Come get your troll treats!

[Ohioan from Florida]

Saying that he's trying to kill her, as opposed to withdrawing her life support, is a big difference.

I have a couple of questions that maybe you could answer. 1.)If she never wanted to live hooked up to tubes as her husband claims...then why did he allow doctors to give her a feeding portal in which to insert a feeding tube in the first place? 2.) If Terri didn't want to live in the way she was living at the time of the malpractice trial, (and you can see from the pictures in some of the above posts what Terri's condition was when the malpractice trial was going on), then why did he try to get money to take care of her for her estimated lifespan of another 51 years at the time. If you don't believe me, go back and look at some of the documentation that you can easily find on the internet.

[tutstar]

Bronco tell us how taking away water and nutrition is 'not killin someone'?

Even the pro-euthanasia camp states such.