To: new cruelty
The difference between now with Kerry and before with Kennedy and Clintoon is the Internet (thanks Owl Bore). The mainstream media REFUSED to print any stories about Kennedy's and Clintoon's sexual escapades. In the last 10-15 years, the media is finally admitting that Kennedy was a "slam bam thank you ma'am" pervert. Considering that Kennedy was Clintoon's mentor, now we know why. But did the mainstream press in 1992 focus on Clintoon's character? No, absolutely NOT. When the elder President Bush kept saying to look at Clintoon's lack of character and lack of morals, not one member of the mainstream press did an investigation. As a result, we had the worse president and 1st lady in our history for 8 miserable years. It took mainstream media to finally in the middle of clintoon's 2nd term to focus on the outbreak of repeated clintoonian affairs. However, now the internet is going strong and the American public can get the news and judge for themselves what type of character they want for the presidency. We are no longer under the mind control and mercy of CBS, ABC, NBC, CNN, etc.
18 posted on
02/12/2004 8:33:26 PM PST by
lilylangtree
(Veni, Vidi, Vici)
To: lilylangtree
Indeed we are not. Can we get a freep going at Kerry HQ? How bout some people throwing their DNC "medals"?
Jane's Fonda Kerry.
John Fonda Kerry
32 posted on
02/12/2004 8:54:32 PM PST by
Jeff Gannon
(Listen to my radio show "Jeff Gannon's Washington" on www.RIGHTALK.com)
To: lilylangtree
And to take your post one step further: Since Al Gore "invented" the internet we can thank him for the exposure of John "Effin" Kerry? :-)
33 posted on
02/12/2004 8:56:05 PM PST by
El Gran Salseron
(It translates as the Great, Big Dancer, nothing more. :-))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson