Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This AP story was already posted here a few days ago under the title "Police See Possible Hate Crime in Calif."

It appears in about sixty other newspapers under the same or a very similar title.

The AZCentral story is the same as all of the others, with the exception of the headline, which has been changed to include the fact that they were "immigrants."

As I discussed here, there are two main problems with the AP report:

1. There are many other possible motives besides it being a hate crime. Why weren't those possibilities highlighted?

2. The AP article morphs from a crime report into a piece designed to get us to give driver's licenses to illegal aliens.

Apparently, AZCentral didn't think the original AP report was biased enough, and it had to come up with an even more inflammatory headline.

Please contact AZCentral using the following addresses and politely suggest they stop publishing AgitProp from the AP and refrain from making the AP's AgitProp even more inflammatory.

AZCentral.com:

Leon Levitt
Executive Vice President/Digital Media
(602) 444-8396
llevitt@azcentral.com

John Leach
Editor, Digital Media
(602) 444-8746
jleach@azcentral.com

AZ Republic:

Ward Bushee Editor 602-444-8087
ward.bushee@arizonarepublic.com

Jeff Dozbaba News Editor 602-444-4379
jeff.dozbaba@arizonarepublic.com

Randy Lovely Managing Editor 602-444-8790
randy.lovely@arizonarepublic.com

AP:
info@ap.org

1 posted on 02/10/2004 12:27:59 PM PST by lonewacko_dot_com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: lonewacko_dot_com
These race-baiting liberals make me nauseous.
2 posted on 02/10/2004 12:33:57 PM PST by zygoat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lonewacko_dot_com
Heck, I'm just amazed that they actually used the words "illegal" and "immigrant" together.
3 posted on 02/10/2004 12:39:18 PM PST by kaboom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lonewacko_dot_com
So it's only a hate crime as long as it is committed by a white person.

Remarkable.

4 posted on 02/10/2004 12:41:29 PM PST by Houmatt (Justice For Carlie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lonewacko_dot_com
"She was not able to get a license, so then they had to walk. And this happened."

So pathetically opportunistic, its funny.

5 posted on 02/10/2004 12:51:24 PM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lonewacko_dot_com
I really don't give a rats ass who it was, white guy, black guy, whatever. A horrible crime was committed and the killer should be brought to justice; end of story. I'm not going to read too much into how the newspaper worded the story. I have no need to go on the defensive like some of you guys here. Two innocent people were murdered. Show some compassion tough guys.





6 posted on 02/10/2004 12:51:24 PM PST by Mr Spock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lonewacko_dot_com
She was not able to get a license, so then they had to walk. And this happened."


Sorry. One is not related to the other. Sorry they were murdered by someone of any color (who described the attacker as white? There was a witness?), but ILLEGAL ALIENS DO NOT NEED A LICENSE!

OR AMNESTY

OR MEDICAL

OR FOOD STAMPS

OR WELFARE



7 posted on 02/10/2004 12:53:23 PM PST by Iron Matron (Give me time, I'll think of something)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lonewacko_dot_com
Every time this article is posted, I get annoyed. If the attacker had been seen to be a black man, would the "hate" crime aspect had been mentioned? It would have been logical to do so as the illegal criminal Mexicans are holding jobs that might have gone to blacks.

I am surprised the author did not hypothesize that the two criminals were killed by "crazed, right-wing, Christian racists..." Of course, the "armed with illegal tree branches" might have detracted. My bet is that a jealous, rejected suitor killed the younger in a fit of passion and got the older woman because she was there. If true, no revision will ever be published.

10 posted on 02/10/2004 1:07:43 PM PST by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lonewacko_dot_com
Because the victims were illegal immigrants, they could not have obtained driver's licenses even if they could afford to buy a car.

Let me get this straight: they don't fear the INS, but they would never cross the DMV? Yeah, we'll live and work illegally, but we won't drive illegally?

11 posted on 02/10/2004 1:08:57 PM PST by prion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lonewacko_dot_com
There's no such thing as a hate crime.
12 posted on 02/10/2004 1:10:58 PM PST by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lonewacko_dot_com

No, thanks. The article was far from a blight upon the nation.

Supposedly we're never supposed to mention the races and nationalities of those involved, nor their legal status, nor how the story relates to current events and issues which are in the minds of Californians?

Supposedly to satisfy the prurient interests of the patriotically-correct© readers, the storyline should have read: "Homeless white man, a former busboy who lost his job 15 years ago to an illegal immigrant for less money, a victim of Reagan's immigration and homeless policies, having been betrayed by the 'conservative' leader, George W. Bush, and seeing the nation betrayed to a certain doom, lashed out in frustration and anger at a couple of illegal invading criminals ..."

16 posted on 02/10/2004 5:15:56 PM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson