It appears in about sixty other newspapers under the same or a very similar title.
The AZCentral story is the same as all of the others, with the exception of the headline, which has been changed to include the fact that they were "immigrants."
As I discussed here, there are two main problems with the AP report:
1. There are many other possible motives besides it being a hate crime. Why weren't those possibilities highlighted?
2. The AP article morphs from a crime report into a piece designed to get us to give driver's licenses to illegal aliens.
Apparently, AZCentral didn't think the original AP report was biased enough, and it had to come up with an even more inflammatory headline.
Please contact AZCentral using the following addresses and politely suggest they stop publishing AgitProp from the AP and refrain from making the AP's AgitProp even more inflammatory.
AZCentral.com:
Leon Levitt
Executive Vice President/Digital Media
(602) 444-8396
llevitt@azcentral.com
John Leach
Editor, Digital Media
(602) 444-8746
jleach@azcentral.com
AZ Republic:
Ward Bushee Editor 602-444-8087
ward.bushee@arizonarepublic.com
Jeff Dozbaba News Editor 602-444-4379
jeff.dozbaba@arizonarepublic.com
Randy Lovely Managing Editor 602-444-8790
randy.lovely@arizonarepublic.com
AP:
info@ap.org
Remarkable.
So pathetically opportunistic, its funny.
I am surprised the author did not hypothesize that the two criminals were killed by "crazed, right-wing, Christian racists..." Of course, the "armed with illegal tree branches" might have detracted. My bet is that a jealous, rejected suitor killed the younger in a fit of passion and got the older woman because she was there. If true, no revision will ever be published.
Let me get this straight: they don't fear the INS, but they would never cross the DMV? Yeah, we'll live and work illegally, but we won't drive illegally?
No, thanks. The article was far from a blight upon the nation.
Supposedly we're never supposed to mention the races and nationalities of those involved, nor their legal status, nor how the story relates to current events and issues which are in the minds of Californians?
Supposedly to satisfy the prurient interests of the patriotically-correct© readers, the storyline should have read: "Homeless white man, a former busboy who lost his job 15 years ago to an illegal immigrant for less money, a victim of Reagan's immigration and homeless policies, having been betrayed by the 'conservative' leader, George W. Bush, and seeing the nation betrayed to a certain doom, lashed out in frustration and anger at a couple of illegal invading criminals ..."