Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Born Conservative
"...There's an appropriate time and place for "religious talk". This flight wasn't it..."

Which time would that be? In church, or in the confines of your home, exclusively? Or are there any public venues in which you would be willing to tolerate religious speech?
63 posted on 02/10/2004 9:59:00 AM PST by jim35 (A third party vote is a vote for the DemocRATs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: jim35
Which time would that be? In church, or in the confines of your home, exclusively? Or are there any public venues in which you would be willing to tolerate religious speech?

In church is fine, and it's also fine in one's home. However, given the context in which this happened (captive audience on an airplane 1 1/2 years after 9/11), I don't think this was the time or place. But for some odd reason, I don't think that you are open-minded enough to see this point.

92 posted on 02/10/2004 10:36:14 AM PST by Born Conservative ("Forgive your enemies, but never forget their names" - John F. Kennedy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: jim35
Or are there any public venues in which you would be willing to tolerate religious speech?

Personally, I am OK with it pretty much anywhere so long as I don't have to pay for it, and so long as I am free to walk away if I don't care to participate or listen. I can't walk away from it on an airplane, so my only choice is to listen, whether I want to or not, or tell the talker to shut up. I am quite willing to tell the talker to shut up (I have done it to plenty of loudmouth cell phone users on Amtrak trains back in the days before Amtrak instituted its "quiet cars"), but I don't appreciate being put in a situation where I have to get nasty or confrontational just because somebody else chooses to be rude.

105 posted on 02/10/2004 10:47:09 AM PST by blau993 (Labs for love; .357 for Security.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: jim35
The pilot is free to do any kind of religious recruiting he wants to ON HIS OWN TIME.

As the acting pilot, however, he represents the company and unless he works for Evangelical Airways and promoting religious discussion is part of his job description his behavior was completely unprofessional.

And frankly, the last thing I personally am interested in is playing 20 questions with the airline crew at 20,000 feet while crammed into a flying beer can, and having just been nearly strip-searched just for the privilege of boarding said flying beer can. At that point I want to sit down, shut up, have the crew shut up and fly the damn plane while I work on the crossword puzzle (if someone else hasn't already completed it).

I don't care what the topic is, it would be just as ridiculous for the pilot to ask all Republicans, vegetarians, Democrats, Wiccans, toupee-wearers, Atkins practioners, or what have you to raise their hands and make themselves available for questioning.

His sole responsiblity is to get the plane safely to it's destination, not to play "religious cruise director" to a group of people trapped in flying can for 3 hours.
The guy let his religious zeal overcome his common sense and should be called on the carpet for it.

The only reason you are in favor of what he did is that you agree with his religious views. If he were Jewish, Muslim or Buddhist you'd be screaming against him even louder than the rest.

LQ
151 posted on 02/10/2004 11:59:39 AM PST by LizardQueen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson