Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hunble
THere are very few rocks that are ENTIRELY sulfur.

During the press conference they mentioned they had two remaining hypotheses for the composition of the outcrop (as distinguished from the spheres)....wind blown dust, or volcanic ash.

These are the top planetary scientists in the world, mind you, and they take the volcanism hypothesis quite seriously.

77 posted on 02/09/2004 8:28:30 PM PST by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: John H K
One thing I've noticed is the apparent lack of rock fields outside the crater...maybe this bedrock erodes away in the wind much faster than basalt.
86 posted on 02/09/2004 8:43:55 PM PST by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

To: John H K
Oh, perhaps you have confused what I have been saying all along.

Of course all of these rocks and soils are volcanic in origin. The only other alternative would be biological in origin, such as calcium deposits. Now that would get my attention!

Nobody has suggested that the "White Cliffs of Dover" have been discoverd on Mars.

My only argument, is when Earth examples are used which are only found in very close proximity to a volcano. Examples used to explain formations on Mars which are well over 500 miles away from this rover location.

That is like offering the hypothisis that rock layers found in England were formed by volcanoes located in North America. Possible, but there may be a much simpler explanation. Like a meteorite crater only 1 km away?

88 posted on 02/09/2004 8:45:59 PM PST by Hunble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson