Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: briant
You may want to read some of Darwin's words and you may have the same idea about species

The definition of species is pretty objective: can two animals breed with one another?

121 posted on 02/09/2004 7:18:50 PM PST by Modernman ("When you want to fool the world, tell the truth." -Otto von Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]


To: Modernman
Actually there is more to it than that. http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=species

Beyond that all you have to ask yourself is: "How do new secies form?"

Do not chimps and humans supposedly have a common ancestor? Could it have been that at some point our ancestors could have been called different sub-species?

The point is that there is no such thing as any of these terms if you dont want to accept them; because you can pick them apart, just like you can pick many human scientific and social concepts apart. Even chemical bonding theories, the definitions of acids and bases and other concepts and categorzations are not immune. But it does not mean these concepts and categorys have no utility or truth to them.
127 posted on 02/09/2004 7:32:06 PM PST by briant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]

To: Modernman
This is actually mch more interesting than my previous effort.

http://research.amnh.org/ornithology/crossbills/species.html
128 posted on 02/09/2004 7:37:42 PM PST by briant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson