Ah, *cough* *cough*. Er, no, my dear, you are interested in winning your argument.
Does ignorance enrich lawyers? Jeez, Louise, I hope so. Why on earth should it impoverish us?
Let's assume best case, let's assume equality. Let's assume you rise or fall, stand or fall, on your own ability, and so do I.
You're the one arguing that the "niggas" have an average IQ of 70. You need that to win; I don't.
Where's the proof?
Does ignorance enrich lawyers? Jeez, Louise, I hope so. Why on earth should it impoverish us?
If juries knew half the truth that lawyers and judges keep from them most lawyers would need to find other employment. Ignorance of this subject has been used as a legal bludgeon against whites for decades now and the popular wisdom that no one has the courage to refute is that social differences between whites and blacks is a result of white discrimination. I think it is only fair for someone to present an alternative theory.
Let's assume best case, let's assume equality. Let's assume you rise or fall, stand or fall, on your own ability, and so do I.
You're the one arguing that the "niggas" have an average IQ of 70. You need that to win; I don't.
Excuse me, ma'am, but I didn't use that word and I resent your implication that I did.
Where's the proof?
What would you accept as proof?