Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stylin_geek
What does "lose the war on terror" mean? Will Osama become dictator over the US or something?

Bush has shown zero interest in protecting our borders. In the war on terror that is paramount.
58 posted on 02/07/2004 5:18:10 PM PST by 34512a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: 34512a
Also, GW had a terrible tie on last month. It clashed-- gotta go Kerry-- here is a good site to check out:
http://www.youdontknowwhoiam.org/youare.swf

79 posted on 02/07/2004 5:25:27 PM PST by Mark (Treason doth never prosper, for if it prosper, NONE DARE CALL IT TREASON.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: 34512a
Your first line is asinine, and you know it.

However, you do make a good second point, and that is a problem. However, will John Kerry prosecute the war on terror? Again, all other issues are meaningless if terrorists are allowed to flourish and obtain WMD. A John Kerry would not even move to register illegals, but would grant any and all of them legal status, without any type of safeguards whatsoever. Would John Kerry talk about activist judges in an SOTU?

To say President Bush is the lesser of two evils is to ignore the fact there are some sharp differences. As I've said, while I don't like some of President Bush's spending, I do think he does have character, and is an honest and God fearing man.
164 posted on 02/07/2004 5:58:23 PM PST by stylin_geek (Koffi: 0, G.W. Bush: (I lost count))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson