Message to ?Conservatives

Vanity | Feb. 11, 2004 | Nix Two

[sauropod]

Spending is up.

It sure is LOL!

The lady is my ex-wife for a whole host of reasons I'd rather not go into on a public forum.

I wish her well.

[sauropod]

Kumbayah baybee...

[sauropod]

Its certainly the case. And all those posts are left up on the board for people to see. Why?

[EternalVigilance]

Your tone is growing quite a bit more reasonable. In fact, I agree with you on a number of points. Many people miss the silver linings staring at the clouds.

[Neets]

And all those posts are left up on the board for people to see. Why?

Why?? I don't know. Maybe these people might know why.

[MissAmericanPie]

Stay calm, we have a front end loader on the way to dig you out of that mountain of bull you just buried yourself in.

[sauropod]

Like I have said many times on this board, I am observing what is going on (or not going on) here.

[EternalVigilance]

Frankly, I'm surprised this thing wasn't moved to 'Chat' a long time ago.

[Miss Marple]

No, I am not getting into personal attacks, but if one goes back to the very beginning of this thread, there are a couple of people who should stand out.

You attack Nix2 for bad-mouthing conservatives, but there are quite a few people on this board who have bad-mouthed Bush from day one of his presidency. Why should those people get a pass?

[Neets]

I wish all vanities would be sent to chat, regardless the topic.

[NeoCaveman]

I wish all vanities would be sent to chat, regardless the topic.

Great idea.

[FairOpinion]

I hope it won't be moved to chat.

It's a better editorial -- with better analysis and better written, than many I see appear in the mainstream media.

Virtually nobody even noticed, much less pointed out the reform aspect of the Medicare bill, which Nix 2 did -- most people are too busy looking at the tree and miss the forest.

[EternalVigilance]

You attack Nix2 for bad-mouthing conservatives, but there are quite a few people on this board who have bad-mouthed Bush from day one of his presidency. Why should those people get a pass?

I certainly didn't 'give them a pass'. Jim certainly hasn't given them a pass.

But those who come here every day and beat incessantly on conservatives are working counter to the President by alienating the very people he needs to win.

As I have said several times, I think the damage they do far exceeds any pinpricks inflicted by 'Bush-bashers'.

From now on, I'm just going to call them what they are: "Conservative-bashers".

[nopardons]

Thanks, Neets. :-)

[EternalVigilance]

It's a better editorial -- with better analysis and better written, than many I see appear in the mainstream media.

Damning with faint praise?

;-)

I disagree. I consider it to be a poorly written rant.

[EternalVigilance]

I hear ya.

[gatorbait]

Or are you just casting aspersions willy-nilly.

Better than casting them Milli Vanilli or Slick Willie....

[Nix 2]

Bye, bye, MissAmericanPie. Took my Chevy to the levy but the levy was dry. Too bad. Bringing heavy equipment to start a pie fight is a bit much, don't you think?

[FairOpinion]

"Stay calm, we have a front end loader on the way to dig you out of that mountain of bull you just buried yourself in."


===

Another example of what passes for "reasoned discussion" for the so-called conservatives (aka Bush-haters)

[EternalVigilance]

Like this:

Now, Bush does the right thing, depriving no one of anything, and the crocodile tears are starting to make Conservatives look more and more like the libs with their hands constantly extended.

What in the heck does all of that mean?