To: jerseygirl
I don't want to seem as though I am minimizing the threat we face. I am just trying to come to some conclusion in my own mind as to the probability of nukes with significant yields or dirty bombs, and/or biological and chemical weapons. I have read in several places by purported AQ that the "nukes" or "dirty bombs" are to be used only if we use them first or if AQ decides that their group and cause is taking severe damage and find themselves with their backs to the wall. This was purportedly stated by OBL in one interview he did 2-3 years ago.
1,965 posted on
02/10/2004 5:06:43 PM PST by
milkncookies
(As Napoleon said, "Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence.")
To: milkncookies
I know I sound like a raving paranoid and am also trying to tell myself not to jump to conclusions. What Sean has written sounds very truthful to me. Moving to Orange alert was verified.
On a positive note- if those of us here, just through posting and reading things- have come up with some sense of what we are facing- imagine how much better our highly trained intelligence experts can do/
To: All
Is there anyone else out there with information not generally available to the public that can be shared wthout violating any secrecy agreements?
1,970 posted on
02/10/2004 5:12:57 PM PST by
milkncookies
(As Napoleon said, "Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson