Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: swarthyguy
So who do you prefer given a choice of only the two, Musharraf and her?
I find the Khan incident hardly forgivable. Are we going to have yet another regime change this Spring?
1,691 posted on 02/10/2004 10:12:34 AM PST by milkncookies (As Napoleon said, "Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1683 | View Replies ]


To: milkncookies
Musharraf, without a doubt. Only a military man can rule Pakistan effectively and to our advantage.

She can't even enter Pakistan. She lives in London.

If there is a regime change, it will be a jihadimilitary coup d'etat.

For better or worse, we're totally committed to Musharraf. There is no alternative. This coming from a guy who feels Musharraf is just a better groomed Arafat. But he's the devil we know and can be armtwisted to do what's necessary.

The Khan incident has ended two and a half years after 9.11.

He's spilling details about the network. And he gets to keep his billions. That's the price for his info.
If Khan was jailed or fined, Musharraf would be overthrown.
1,696 posted on 02/10/2004 10:20:23 AM PST by swarthyguy (Russia doesn't conduct negotiations with terrorists -- it destroys them," Vlad Putin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1691 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson