Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Shermy
For information, this is what they're hitting us on:

When White House communications director Dan Bartlett was asked before the war whether Saddam Hussein was an imminent threat, he responded, "Of course he is." When White House spokesman Scott McClellan was asked why NATO (and thus the United States) should support Turkey's request for defensive troops, he responded, "This is about an imminent threat." When White House spokesman Ari Fleischer was asked whether the invasion of Iraq was because Iraq was an imminent threat, he responded, "Absolutely."

The president said before the war that Iraq was an "urgent threat" and a "grave threat" to "any American." In his speech informing Americans that the invasion had started, the President said Iraq "threatens the peace with weapons of mass murder."

In this case, the exact way that the response was phrased matters less than what was implied. It seems that Tenent has gotten tired of the CIA being the Media's whipping boy and is trying to spread the blame around.

30 posted on 02/05/2004 3:12:28 PM PST by Zeroisanumber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Zeroisanumber
Press spokesmen weren't trained in the art of the wording.

I've never seen so much axe grinding and disinformation about words in different uses.

I think it will pass most voters.
32 posted on 02/05/2004 3:15:13 PM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson